On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:18:42 Hillger, Don wrote: >Marcus (and others), > >It does not matter what the exact subject was, the content was not in line with the >intent for messages on the USMA list.
??? Sir, several times in this forum contents are 'not in line' and yet no word is mentioned about those instances. Why are you being this aggressive and picking on me, personally? > List members should be smart enough to figure out when they've crossed the line And I haven't 'crossed that line', sir, in any way, shape or form. The burden of proof that that happened is on you, sir. Instead of accusing me of having done something wrong, why don't you settle this matter by showing me what I've done wrong, please? And (evidently) don't forget to quote the "book of rules" to substantiate your linching me in public like this. > and should either have stopped the discussion or taken it off the USMA list, Again, where is the *discussion*, sir? Since when the sharing of information is "discussion"? Since when answering questions *of order* is "discussion"? Again, I must ask, why are you being this arbitrary? > to another list, or personally to another subscriber. > For your info, sir, when there HAS been *discussion* on the subject that's precisely what I did! If you don't believe me, ask Brij, for instance, or a couple of other individuals I remember having mentioned to them I was responding privately to them! Alas, I have been doing precisely that, I have been quite careful about that and yet this is what I get?... :-( >Quit arguing about it and just stop, or go elsewhere. ? 'Quit arguing'? How can I? You have accused me of doing something wrong AND in public! So... I have **every right in the book** to defend myself, regardless of book rules'! This is a universal right that every free individual has in a free society, including here. 'and stop it', stop what? Defending myself? If I've done wrong, fine, I'll bite the bullet, but if I haven't, again I repeat I must defend myself and hold my clean reputation and not allow it to be tarnished and humiliated like this! Please, be sensible and judge things fairly and unbiasedly, not according to appearances, but to *facts*. Please! Is that too much to ask? Honestly? 'go elsewhere', is this a threat, sir? > How many ways do I have to say that? > Are you hinting at expelling me from this forum or something? If you are, on what grounds? I have done nothing wrong, sir! Until you prove me wrong that's the position I have to take, i.e. to defend myself. Therefore, I can't "quit arguing" until I clear this. Marcus > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of Ma Be >Sent: Wednesday, 2004 January 07 17:10 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:28192] Ati tu brutus?! > > >On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:47:48 > Hillger, Don wrote: >>Marcus, >> >>Let's stop the calendar discussion. As pointed out many times before, this is the >>USMA list, and calendar reform is not part of SI, and it drives away those who want >>to talk about metrication of the U.S.!!! >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#% I'm starting to get quite upset over this. I must repeat my >question below and I *challenge* YOU, sir, to ***prove*** I was having ANY >*discussion* of calendar reform! > >I merely shared developments taking place in my company and ***answered*** some few >questions ****of order**** dealing with that subject, nothing more nothing less. >Nowhere have I EVER "*discussed*" calendar reform. I have stopped doing that long >time ago due to the unfortunate intolerance of a few whiners here (and sorry for >saying it, including yourself, apparently...). > >So, this is totally unfair of your part, sir, to charge me with this. > >And sorry for the strong words but I am very disturbed by your allegations... One >thing I have little tolerance for is misrepresentation and false charges. > >But have a nice day, nonetheless. > >Marcus > >>Don >>USMA list owner >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Behalf Of Ma Be >>Sent: Wednesday, 2004 January 07 09:40 >>To: U.S. Metric Association >>Subject: [USMA:28185] Re: Give you credit?... >> >> >>On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:45:12 >> James R. Frysinger wrote: >>>Would you two please take this discussion off line to private correspondance >>>or another mail list? >>>... >>??? Who's discussing anything here? Please, before you make statements like that, >>please, I repeat, pay attention to the *content* of the message, and, *especially*, >>the **reason** provided. Thanks. >> >>Marcus >> >> >>____________________________________________________________ >>Get 25MB of email storage with Lycos Mail Plus! >>Sign up today -- http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus >> > > >____________________________________________________________ >Get 25MB of email storage with Lycos Mail Plus! >Sign up today -- http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus > ____________________________________________________________ Get 25MB of email storage with Lycos Mail Plus! Sign up today -- http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus
