|
I read the posting about the N. Y. s. D.O. T.
thinking of going back to FFU. If this happens i feel it would be an
unfortunate thing. I feel that any state that has gone back to FFU will
probably never go back to metric. Why have so many states gone back?
I believe all highway construction contracts in Canada are metric, but i'm not
sure. If someone could let me know i would really appreciate it. It
must of cost Utah quite a bit of money to switch back to FFU considering they
had sold all their old FFU books. The BWMA would love to hear about N.Y.
thinking of going back to FFU. I also believe that all highway construction
contracts in the U K are done in metric, again if someone could let me know that
would be great. Just think if highway construction contracts in the U K
are in metric the members of the BWMA have to either walk or
drive on them every day. Oh how that must bug them. Have a great
evening
John.
|
- [USMA:28200] Re: New York state department of transport... john mercer
- [USMA:28200] Re: New York state department of tran... Andy Johnson
- [USMA:28201] Re: New York state department of ... Brian J White
- [USMA:28203] Re: New York state department of tran... Joseph B. Reid
- [USMA:28205] Re: New York state department of ... Terry Simpson
- [USMA:28212] RE: New York state department of tran... Carleton MacDonald
- [USMA:28218] Re: New York state department of tran... Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:28238] Metric Roads in Australia Gene Mechtly
- [USMA:28240] Re: Metric Roads in Australia Pat Naughtin
