|
Hello I am going to put an opinion forward witch
will probably upset some people but here goes. I have given a lot of
thought to this. The word foot is a part of American and Canadian
measurement language. What does anybody think of changing the foot from 12
inches to 30 Cms, but still calling it a foot. Most people when they talk
of lenth talk in feet IE if a person has a boat they will say it's 40
feet. They never say 3 yds and 1 foot. If this were to happen my
suggestion is to make all rulers 30 cm with no inches. The argument against this
could be that using a 30 cm foot if a person wanted to convert it to cm's as the
number of feet got higher the cm numbers would be very high. This is true
but how many people convert the number of feet to inches. The metric
foot would be divided in to ten 3 cm parts. For example peoples
heights instead of saying 5 ft 1 in they could say 5.1 feet. This
works out to very close to 5 feet 1 inch. Most people know their
height approx. I know this sounds very radical and you might think i am trying
to go backwards but like i have said before i would like to have the metric
system accepted by the average person. I know this is not perfect but
sometimes comprimise is not so bad. With a 30 cm foot if you asked a person what
is a tenth of it they could easily tell you. If you asked a person what is
a tenth of a 12 inch foot you might have a little more trouble getting an
answer. Thank you very much, i hope i didn't upset anybody to
much, but sometimes i feel we who love the metric system can forget
about the average person. I'm saying this to myself more then anybody
else.
|
- [USMA:28963] RE: Metric foot john mercer
- [USMA:28963] RE: Metric foot Bill Potts
- [USMA:28979] Re: Metric foot Bill Hooper
- [USMA:28987] Some metrication don'ts Pat Naughtin
