Well said! Am I missing something? I simply can't find any significant anti-liter statements or recommendations on the BIPM website, aside from historical references to high-accuracy measurements where possible confusion at the 28 ppm level from the re-definition in the early 1960s might be significant. Can anyone produce the actual recommendations against liters that you all are talking about?
On Sunday 16 May 2004 13:03, Pat Naughtin wrote: > While I know that BIPM takes a different view, I am also aware that the > constructions, cubic centimetres, cubic decimetres, and cubic metre, are > quite clumsy when compared to millilitres, litres, and kilolitres; and this > clumsiness is compounded when we need to use megalitres, gigalitres, and > even larger units as we consider water volumes on the Earth's driest > continent.
