http://www.cogw.org/bible%20study/facts1.htm

I found this of interest. I remember that back in the '70s there actually
was a Bible that was 100 % metric.  I was looking for a reference to that
when I came across that site.  Notice how none of the units are imperial.  I
found the approximations into both metric and US quite interesting.

Example, the mina is equated to 500 g and also to one pound.  This would
make the BWMA cringe at the thought that the ancients used a pound of 500 g.
LOL.  Even the gallon is equated to 3.6 litres, making the blood pint of 450
mL a more true pint.

I know these are all approximations and not meant to be exact, but it is fun
to point these things out to people who claim the bible uses imperial
measurements.

Euric



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, 2004-08-08 06:00
Subject: [USMA:30675] Re: Stupid anti-metric poem


> This is not a forum for disproving the Bible, Scott.
>
> The original thread was that some people use their belief in God to
> prove that we should use imperial units, Euric made a sensible comment
> that imperial comes from Babylon, and that the Bible says that we should
> use honest weights and measures.
>
> Now, whether you believe the Bible or not, the fact remains that a large
> proportion of the US population considers itself to be Christian. This
> is something that cannot be overlooked.
>
> Thus there will be in the minds of some christians an opposition to
> metric as they believe that God gave them the imperial system. To those
> people we can say, as Euric did, that the imperial system is pagan, and
> that God requires a system of honest weights and measures, which do not
> vary, and the only system in the world today that can provide such a
> system is the metric system. The imperial system is not accurate enough,
> nor consistent between countries, to be used in our modern world.
>
> The religious argument is important when trying to convert religious
> people to accept metric.
>
> For those who do not believe or read the Bible, then the above would be
> meaningless and a different approach would be required.
>
> But I will add that as a Christian myself, I have never ever felt that
> God requires me to use the imperial system, and that He would prefer us
> to use a sensible and easy to use system that the whole world uses, just
> as the early Church used the Roman Empire to spread the Gospel. But I
> won't go any further into religious discussions as this is a forum about
> getting the USA to go metric rather than a Christian forum.
>
> David King
>
>
>
> Scott Hudnall wrote:
>
> > Measurement and mathematics in the Bible should be taken with a
> > healthy dose of skepticism and an few mg of salt. There are a lot of
> > good examples found at
> > http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/long.html .
> >
> > Here are a few of my favorites:
> >
> > 68. Since the molten sea was round with a diameter of ten cubits and a
> > circumference of thirty cubits, we know that the biblical value of p
> > is 3. (The actual value is approximately 3.14159.)  4:2
> >
> > 21. Noah is
>
> .... blah blah blah
>

Reply via email to