--- Jim Elwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
...
> It must be MIGHTY depressing to feel you have so
> little control over life, and that only the
> government or the "collective" can make any
> change!!!!!
>
NO, what makes me 'mighty depress(ed)' is the sheer
stupid stubborn by people who continue to want to push
THEIR trash onto US from the outside really!!!!!!

As for the issue of governments getting involved,
again, I repeat for the *n-th* time, there is
*absolutely NO proof WHATSOEVER* that YOUR (in the US)
approach works!  What we *actually* have is quite the
opposite!  And I find it quite intriguing that you
STILL insist on believing otherwise with SO MUCH PROOF
of metrication success WHEN IT WAS *GOVERNMENTS* which
took the initiative to make it happen!!!  In other
words:

Metrication success: 100% when governments got
involved in making it happen (and I don't really care
what approach any of these took to make it happen,
boards, forced legislation, etc).

Metrication failure: Nearly 100% when governments
chickened out (and NO, sporadic instances of
metrication here and there are NO proof of success! 
Why?  Again, let this process *GET NOTICED BY IFP
GOONS/PUBLIC/STRONG ANTI-METRIC LOBBYISTS* and just
watch what happens (proof: DOT fiasco!)).
 
> Being the Libertarian, Free-Market, Laissez Faire,
> Capitalist Pig that I am, I know that most societal
> change comes from the action of private individuals,
> individually and combined into organizations such as
> companies, corporations, non-profits, universities,
> research organizations, lobbying groups, etc.
>
True, but mostly partially.  Besides, BTW, interesting
you put that 'lobbying group' as part of YOUR OWN
list!  Which goes to show even yourself appear to
agree there IS need for 'lobbying' for things to
happen!  I consider that good progress, Jim!  :-)
 
> Heck, Marcus, I metricated my company and didn't
> need any "collective" will to do so (I didn't even
> ask for Board approval -- it made sense so I did
> it).

What position do you have in your company again, Jim? 
Err...  Last I saw you were the *PRESIDENT* weren't
you???  Hmm...  must say something...  ;-)

When the right people are in the right position (of
power, that is), of course things can be made to
happen.  Heck, I wish I was the President of the
United States of the Bush caliber (pig-headed, etc,
etc...).  You just watch what would happen!!! 
*Leadership*, man, without it, indeed here we both
agree, NOTHING happens!

> So have Ford, Chrysler, GM. So have most
> electronics component manufacturers.

Yes, and/but do you know why, Jim?  One of the MAIN
STRONGEST reasons was the *power* that metric
businesses and stakeholders exercised on them to do
so!  Fortunately here they could and did!

On the other hand a word I received from a colleague
who is a big shot at the Ford organization tells me
the American establishment STILL thinks *pretty much*
in ifp all across the board.  They continue insisting
on designing *THINKING IFP*, heck, how much more
idiotic can one still be???  :-(  Proof?  Just look at
guarantee and test specs and whatnot, to name ONE
example!!!

> ... Even the US military did it without
> Congressional mandate.

Again, Jim, please, please consult the reasons behind
these things FIRST, man!  NATO partners, sir!  THEY
were the ones who pressured their US partner(s) to do
so, and EVEN THEN one still sees the US NAVY
**hasn't** largely joined in yet!  (You don't believe
me?  Fine, ask your commanders in that branch of your
armed forces for a reality check!)

And I'm SURE they did so VERY RELUCTANTLY!  And this
is another thing that makes me furious!  That ONLY
when they're pressured to do so they go ahead,
grumbling, complaining, fuming and all, etc.  Or do
you honestly believe they were "happy in obliging"??? 
If you do, you're so naive, man!

Aside from the few 'brothers in arms' here I'm YET to
find a bunch of Americans who are even sympathetic to
metric.  Therefore I have no choice but to concur with
what Euric said here in another post.  It confirms my
suspicions, that the US is STILL of a very
imperialistic mind when it comes to things like this. 
Call it indeed inferiority complex or something, heck,
I don't know what else to say...

> When enough of this has
> happened, the government will fall in line.
>
Sigh...  It's really baffling and amazing to me, Jim,
to see such an elightened individual such as yourself
insisting on "wanting to reinvent the whell"!  All
perhaps because you take your libertarian views and
mindset over the weight of the evidence!  Also
startling that 'nah, in the US we do it OUR way',
blah, blah, blah...  Sigh...  What can I say, man?

Can't you guys at least be humble enough to admit that
when it comes to certain things others have a 
PROVEN-TRIED-TESTED-AND-TRUE *better/faster/more
effective way*???
 
> I simply give up with you Marcus. You clearly
> believe that without the US Federal Government
> mandating metrication, this country will never
> metricate.

Jim, ONLY when the rest of the world starts realizing
THEY have to PUT A HUGE STICK ON YOUR NECK will you
"get it"!  And EVEN THEN there is no assurance since
these players are so stubborn...  However, you still
haven't proven me wrong on the weight of the evidence
aspect of things (e.g. DOT fiasco).

There, yes, this MIGHT be the only way to get things
done there.  I can only imagine when 2009 comes and
you fail in securing other 'free market agreements'
(where you can *IMPOSE* your will on others!) what's
going to happen...  I just pray consumers, especially,
like me, will finally say: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH IS
ENOUGH!!!

Coming to think of it, perhaps I should thank your
current president for a lot of this...  ;-)
as a considerable number of people around the world
continues to be more and more fed up by the way the US
GOP has been handling things on a foreign arena... 
(food for thought!).  Who knows, this is where our
hope may lie?...  In any case, again, 8-9 years and
counting BTW...  ;-)

> I believe that not only is that untrue,
> but that we are *already* metricating.
>
Sigh...  Fine, keep on being an incurable optimist,
you're just kidding yourself till reality check sinks
in:  8-9 years, man...
 
> All I ask is that you not express your pessimism
> outside of this forum -- you will only make our job
> harder.
> 
Oh, now it's MY fault, eh?...  But for your info, of
course I keep this sort of thing "between us". 
Despite my giving up the fact of the matter is I now
realize I have much more important things (indeed, we
both agree!) to do to waste my time over a lost cause.
 So, again, I'll leave it up to you folks knowing that
the war is lost as far as the US is concerned (unless
we, of the rest of the world, arise to the occasion
and ultimately FORCE you to do so!  ;-)  ).

Well... enough of tongue in cheek, serious now.  Sorry
for the apparent ranting here and there, Jim.  I just
had to let off some steam, I hope you'll forgive me...

8-9 years and counting, that's all I'll leave you with
for now, Jim.

Best regards,

Marcus OUT.

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Reply via email to