Hi All
 
I came across a reference to Prof Robin Connor's book on this list, and joined in the hope of getting feedback on some of my own current thoughts on historical metrology.  I apologise that these are a minority interest matter, and a bit off topic.
 
My story runs like this - I have been interested in Early Indian coins for about 30 years - but only about 2 years back I discovered strong evidence that the Indian weight system had gone little changed for about 4,000 years, and indeed does not seem to have changed at all from about 2000 BC to 200 BC.  But also that almost all academic specialists seemed to be judging the matter on their preconceptions, within limited time frames, and ignore or miss the evidence, and report an un-standardised and fragmentary system.
 
So I turned to the European situation - and quickly discovered that the standard pound (mina) of Shulgi (Mesopotamia c. 2100 BC) was close to 500 grams - the same as that of Darius (c 500 BC) and the same as that of Napoleon (metric pound = 500 grams).  And that a minority of scholars over the generations had taken this matter seriously, whilst the majority I consulted rejected it out of hand (as an 'accident')
 
No time here to go further into the details of this  - but my current thoughts are that there are very deep impulses in human nature towards universal common standards - and also very deep impulses to deny them.  And that these conflicting impulses are vividly displayed in the study of historical metrology itself  [- which seems to me to be determined far more by modern pre-conception than by fact]
 
Apologies again if this is too far off topic - I'd welcome feed back from anyone on or off list who has taken an interest in these matters (or onward links).
 
Robert Tye

Reply via email to