|
In a message dated 2005-06-05 14:24:07 Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone cite cases, for example, where body weights in pounds are so I weigh 14 stone, must less messy than saying 196 lbs :-)
Actually here in the US I don't see how people could think it
bothersome to use larger numbers. We seem to have a tendency to
user larger numbers than we have to already. We prefer to go from feet to
miles and skip yards in many applications and we don't make use of the stone, we
simply use pounds. Larger numbers would be no issue for people, just
something to get used to. The only reason a 46 inch waist sounds large is
because we're used to what a 46 inch waist means; it wouldn't take long to learn
what a 1000 mm or 100 cm waist is. We get a 'feel' for units by using
them.
|
- [USMA:33114] Re: Use of millimetres CredoinIesum
- [USMA:33115] Re: Use of millimetres Bill Hooper
- [USMA:33117] Re: Use of millimetres Daniel
- [USMA:33118] Re: Use of millimetres Phil Chernack
- [USMA:33119] Re: Use of millimetres Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:33120] Re: Use of millimetres Phil Chernack
- [USMA:33141] Re: Use of millimetres Philip S Hall
- [USMA:33143] Re: Use of millimetres Daniel
- [USMA:33145] Re: Use of millimetres Philip S Hall
- [USMA:33146] Literacy and numeracy Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:33147] FW: Literacy and nume... Pat Naughtin
