Title: Re: [USMA:34279] Long live the good old British pint!
Dear Pat
 
I have it on reasonably good authority from someone who lives and works in Brussels that the so called "pint" being served in bars and restaurants in that area is in fact half litre. They use the word pint for the British customers. It would also like to mention that if in fact the Belgian government were to legalise the 568 millilitre pint they would be in breach of the European Directive on units of measurement. The derogation only allows selected imperial units for specific purposes in member states that were using them on 21st April 1971 (if memory serves) which basically means the UK and Ireland.
 
Phil Hall
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: [USMA:34478] Re: Long live the good old British pint!

on 2005-09-06 22.16, Daniel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dear Daniel,

I have interspersed some remarks in blue.

  
Long live the good old British  pint!

This will be quite a difficult for the pint to do since the good old British  pint  died as a measuring unit as soon as it was defined as 568 millilitres. (To be clear on this point, I will call the currently legal 568 millilitre pint, the 'metric pint', and I will refer to all of the 'old pre-metric pints' as old pre-metric pints.) The good old British  pint died as soon as it became the modern metric pint.

September 6 2005 at 10:38  AM
Tony  Bennett

Long live the good old British pint! - 05 September  2005

PRESSURE is mounting on Britain to join Europe in using metric  measures, and abolish the mile, pint and acre in favour of kilometres,  litres and hectares.

All of the old miles (nautical UK, USA, Irish, and Swedish) have already been abolished. All of these and the many other old miles have been redefined in terms of metric units. For example UK road engineers, who design and build roads use millimetres for surface thicknesses, metres for road widths, and kilometres for road lengths, then apply a factor of 1609.344 to place the mileposts at intervals of a metric mile (Note: The metric mile is based on the same 1959 definitions as metric inches, metric feet, metric yards, and metric chains). Of course applying these markers at metric mile intervals simply gives the illusion that some sort of old pre-metric miles are being used, but this is simply an illusion -- the engineers know better.

The UK Government has been reminded by the  European Commission of its legal requirements to set a date to convert  into metric measures with the rest of Europe.

To an outsider like me, here in Australia, the European Commission is simply asking the government of the UK to be honest with the citizens of Europe when they communicate in measuring terms. As a side issue, they are possibly also politely suggesting that it might be a good idea for the UK to be honest with their own citizens as well.

But Tom Wise, MEP for  the UK Independence Party in the Eastern Region, is fighting to keep the  imperial system of measurements.

Metrication is a done deal. It's over. It's finished. But it is still hidden in some activities in the UK.

The UK is now, and has been for quite a while a fully metric country. It is only the hiding of this fact from the public that the present debate continues. If Tom Wise wants to reinstate imperial measures he will have to be honest enough to publicly state that he wants to throw out the entire measuring infrastructure currently relied on by the UK. For example the currently used metric inch will have to go and this will need to be replaced by (yet another) definition of an inch together with another government infrastructure department to support this new 'old pre-metric inch (and the new 'old pre-metric foot', new 'old pre-metric yard', and the new 'old pre-metric chain).

He says it is ridiculous that soon  we may not be able to order a pint of beer.

This is, of course, absolute nonsense. You can order a pint of beer anytime you like. Of course, whether you get a pint of beer is entirely another matter.

Lobbyists from the beverage industry long ago (perhaps 1824 when the imperial pint was invented) lobbied governments to make sure that when anyone ordered a pint, they got somewhat less than a pint. This was achieved by writing into law the idea that a pint could be served in a pint container, that is, a container that could hold, to the brim, a pint of liquid. But beer is not liquid; it is liquid plus froth and beer drinkers have long been cheated of a portion (about 10 % of each beer). In the good old days, they were cheated out of about 2 ounces in each pint, and, with the metric pint of 568 millilitres, they are routinely served about 500 millilitres of beer in each pint they order.

If Tom Wise wants to use the word 'pint' when he next orders a beer he might be well advised to consider the Lewis Carroll quotation:
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.' However if Tom Wise uses the word, pint, it will almost always be less.

"The British Government  has now passed a law saying even the mention of imperial measurements -  pounds and ounces - will be illegal by 2009", he said.

We should note here the differences between the words that were used as old pre-metric measures and the same words that are now defined in law. The old pre-metric imperial pint is no longer legal for trade in the UK and to imply that it is, is quite a strange thing for a politician to do.

"It is  nonsense. Pubs will have to replace all the glasses which will cost a  fortune.

Well, he got the first bit right --
It is  nonsense -- to suggest that glasses will have to be replaced. The simple solution that would be made by an honest politician and an honest government, who were intending to be open and honest with their electorates, would simply require that glasses be marked at the 500 millilitre level. The only change necessary is to require an honesty mark on the side of the glass and this could be phased in over as glass breakages occurred.

There would be no need to change the size of the size of the glass from its present legal size of 568 millilitres; there would be no need to change glass making machinery; there would be no need to change glass washing machinery. The only need for change would be to change from a long well established dishonest mindset to a mindset that was open, honest, and fair to British beer drinkers, and to put a small honesty mark on the side of each glass.

"In the closest pub to Brussels parliament you can ask for  a pint and still get one.

Of course you can ask for a pint, but what you get will be legally determined by the publican, by the local trade authorities, and by the Belgian government, and all of these operate in metric units. However, these combined forces probably ensure that if you ask for a pint in Brussels there is a good chance that you might actually get 568 millilitres of beer. Note that this is not the case in Britain where, I believe, that in about 95 % of pubs if you order a pint of beer you will get somewhat less than the metric pint of 568 millilitres.

"I don't go in pubs much, but I may make  a point of going into a pub just to order a pint.

It might be a good idea to also measure how much you are served when you ask for a pint. And then check whether there is more or less honesty in beer selling in Belgium as there is in the UK.

"There is no  cause to go metric. It is another excuse to rip us off. They will have to  put the prices up to cover costs, and we will foot the bill for  that.

How much does honesty cost? Might I respectfully suggest that honesty costs a lot less than the dishonesty that you are promoting with its attendant obfuscation and confusion. Estimates of the cost of the UK using part metric and part old pre-metric measures vary, but a conservative estimate of what the confusion caused by multiple measuring methods is costing the UK is about 15 % of GDP. This would make the cost to the UK of not being fully metric about 150 billion British pounds per year (
£976 331 361 x 0.15 using 2004 estimates). Let me stress that this is an annual loss of 150 billion British pounds.

"If you order a litre of beer you will get drunk quicker but  you might not even be able to carry the glass!"

As you said earlier,
I don't go in pubs much, but if you did you would know that a litre is a very rare size of beer to order anywhere in the world. Probably the most common size is the half litre or 500 millilitres. Even in the UK when people order a 'pint of beer, please' they actually receive close to 500 mL of beer.

It is another  excuse to rip us off. This is fantasy land.

As I think I have made clear, when anyone orders a pint of beer in an English pub they are almost always ripped off. This has been going on since the beverage industry lobbied the 'pint to the brim' rule through government legislation and regulation. I presume that when you contemplate the patience of British drinkers tolerating this situation for generations you are referring to the UK as a fantasy land.

Mr Wise has now written  to the European Commission to find out who is following up the demand for  change. Soon we won't be able to ask for a pint of milk or five pounds of  potatoes.

"This is pure fantasy land."

There will be no change. In the future, as now, when you ask for a pint of milk you will receive 568 mL as this is the legal UK definition of a pint of milk. Similarly, your pound of potatoes will be supplied to you as about 454 grams and this will be weighed on legal scales that are now required to measure using metric units.

There will be no change to this in future, the only change being that the supplier will have to be more open, honest, and transparent with their customers and sadly this does not come naturally to many traders, and to some politicians.

It may trouble you that you are getting a metric pint instead of an old pre-metric pint (or a metric pound instead of an old pre-metric pound) but as I said previously, metrication is a done deal; it is over; it is finished. All you can do is get with it, get over it, and then get on with it.

The scrapping of  pounds and ounces in shops caused widespread resentment.

Pounds and ounces were not scrapped in shops. If any customer who ordered a pound of sausages in a butcher's shop since 1965 was refused service by the butcher, I have yet to hear of it. The fact is that honest metric measuring instruments were required to replace all of the old imperial ones as they wore out.  I am sure that if, you as an old man, ordered a pound of cheese in a delicatessen in 20 years time, you will be supplied with 454 grams, just as you would be supplied now.

Be aware that what you are fighting against is the change in language that occurs when some words are no longer relevant, just as you no longer measure using the biblical words bath or cubit because these were replaced long ago.

The danger is that in publicly regretting the loss of some words, or the lesser use of these words, you are also openly attacking the ideas ands concepts behind a fair, honest, and open system of measurement. I can only hope that you do so in ignorance of the long history and well developed procedures of modern metrology.

Neil  Herron, of the Metric Martyrs Defence Fund, said: "Any government that  tries to introduce legislation to remove the British working man's pint  will be committing political suicide.

"People won't put up with it  and there would be mass demands to leave the European  Union".

As I said earlier, it is a long time since there has been such a thing as British working man's pint. Sure, many have ordered a pint, but few have received one. If Neil Herron is unaware of this common everyday deception, he should get out to the pub more often and observe what actually happens when anyone orders a 'British working man's pint' please.

Britain promised to introduce metric measurements in 1979,  but was given a 'derogation' allowing it to delay implementation of some  if the changes.

The country's failure to propose a deadline is  viewed in Brussels as a breach of the spirit of its  commitments.

The folk in Brussels are probably right in thinking that Britain is playing strange delaying games. After all 26 years does seem a trifle tardy.

[First appeared in the Cambridge Evening  News]

Reply via email to