This is obviously a response to a private email, made public on these
boards.
And that is shockingly bad netiquette.
Which confirms - the *is* the Steve Davies that posted on another forum.
Be aware folks, euric was bad, but at least he didn't send excel
spreadsheets to the private house of an individual who was standing in an
election for intimidatory reasons. Davies is a UK version of Daniel/Euric.
I won't go any further as here is not the place for it. Individuals can
email him privately directly if they want to know more.
Just cross your fingers that he does not respond in a manner that makes it
public to all.
From: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:34838] RE: Vulgar
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:28:24 +0100
Jim Elwell wrote:
" Perhaps you should address your concerns to Daniel. Or are you
suggesting he get to spew his venom freely?"
No - I'm suggesting that you (and Steven Humphreys) have made your point
now, and continually ganging up on this particular individual with the aid
of Steven Humphreys is starting to smack of boring, ignorant bullying.
OK. He doesn't share the same viewpoint as you on this particular matter.
That, believe it or not Jim, is allowed. You have made your point
forcefully several times.
Let's drop it now, eh? And move on. That'd be nice.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Elwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [USMA:34826] RE: Vulgar
> At 12 10 05, 12:42 PM, Stephen Davis wrote:
> >No one."
> >
> >Right! Have you both got this little bit of pique out of your
> >systems now? If so, could we drop it please because it's starting
> >to get REALLY boring now!
>
> Perhaps you should address your concerns to Daniel. Or are you
> suggesting he get to spew his venom freely?
>
> Jim Elwell
>
