You are talking nonsense. The value of pi is irrational.
No brick batting & I do not mean to hurt!
What makes you conclude.....The value of pi is irrational.?
Brij Bhushan Vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Kali5106-W27-01)/D-290+1 (Tuesday)2005 Oct.18H0753(decimal) IST
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendar******
Telephone: +91-11-25590335
From: Pierre Abbat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:34900] Re: common fractions fail for some numbers
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 02:33:05 -0400
On Sunday 16 October 2005 01:42, Brij Bhushan Vij wrote:
> The question I raised is NOT which value for Pi is more accurate & why?
BUT
> that *is there a value for Pi that satisfy the relation: a circle has 2
Pi
> radians - without defining either Pi or radian*? If there is a deviation
to
> value for Pi, with WHAT are we attempting to compare, to kaow how musch
is
> this OFF; AND from what standard!
> I claim my value for Pi that defines *both the value for Pi and Radian
and
> FIXES their values*. Thus, Pi =100000/31831 (exact); and fixes radian at
> 57*.2958 =57* 17/44".88 - a value fixed by International Society of
> Mathematics.
You are talking nonsense. The value of pi is irrational. It can be defined
as
the ratio of circumference to diameter, the smallest positive number whose
sine is 0, or the sum of any of various infinite series, and these are all
the same number. 100000/31831 and 355/113 are not values of pi, they are
approximations to pi.
phma
