Well, isn't he suppose to now show a metric declaration? It should already
show 355 mL, and if it doesn't, he has to be in violation of the FPLA as it
presently stands. Or is he exempt somehow?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Elwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 2005-10-31 18:44
Subject: [USMA:35104] Re: About Celsius Packaging
At 31 October 2005, 04:35 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The beginning of your message to him was about how
other manufacturers were packaging their goods in
metric sizes. It wasn't merely that he had failed to
include metric on the label.
It's just that (c) can do more harm than good because
it perpetuates the belief that metrication means that
people will end up having to use irrational sizes like
3.78 liter bottles and 454 g packages.
If he just adds 355 mL to his 12 oz bottle, it won't do any good, but I
don't think it will do any harm, because no one (except members of this
list) will really notice.
I still have to ask if you see ANYTHING positive in his response? I
certainly do, even if it is only a small step.
Jim
Jim Elwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
801-466-8770
www.qsicorp.com
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release Date: 2005-10-31
