Yes Steve, I know you responded to me, I told the board that yesterday, that you responded to me privately.
I queried why you couldn't have put your response on to the message board. Now, in effect, you have. There! Didn't hurt, did it? Why make such a big song and dance about it? Please don't be so keen to attempt to mislead in future, OK, Steve? That way, it's unlikely you'll be continually pressed to clarify what you mean. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:27 AM Subject: [USMA:36103] RE: Dual measurements on pints - change the discussion > I responded to you - see the archives for yesterday. I made two points of > clarification and an attempt to finish the debate. > > You can see this post from the archive link below, Steve: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg26293.html > > > In the absence of 'polls' available to users of this listserv - can I ask if > anyone is getting any value out of this 'discussion'? > > I've tried (twice) to close it in the belief that it's at best clutter and > at worst a slanging match I didn't ask for. It's also caused off-list > private emails to get publicly posted - which I believe to be wrong > practice. > > Unless I'm wrong and people are getting some form of interest or > entertainment from this 'discussion' can we finally close it now? > > > >From: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> > >Subject: [USMA:36094] Dual measurements on pints. > >Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:01:21 -0000 > > > >Stephen Humphrey's, for reasons best known to himself, has decided to > >respond to my question privately rather than on the board. > > > >It seems a response on the message board is good enough for everyone else > >but, apparently, not for Steve. > > > >Fair enough, I suppose...there's no law against it. > > > >If he isn't brave enough to hold his opinions up to scrutiny on the message > >board like everyone else, that's his business. > > > >Over to you, Steve. ;-) > > > >Regards, > > > > > >Steve. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
