Paul,

Thanks for writing another excellent letter to advance metrication in the USA.

Gene Mechtly
University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign

---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:36:13 -0600
>From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject: [USMA:38025] How much water is in this bottle?  
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>Cc: "Elizabeth Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Dear American Beverage Association,
>
>A label from my favorite bottled water, Aquafina, prompts me to write to you 
>about improving U.S. beverage product labeling for the consumer.  According 
>to the current Aquafina label (example attached), this bottle contains "16.9 
>fl. oz 1.05 PT (500 mL)."
>
>You might expect a number of consumers to ask, "How much water is in this 
>bottle?"
>
>Is this numerical muddle what you and I really want on our product labels? 
>Is it fair to anyone who reads the label to have to interpret this list of 
>measurement units?
>
>Over the past 30 years, the soft drink industry has been a leader in 
>popularizing the metric system with the American people. Indeed, one major 
>carbonated- beverage producer takes particular pride in the fact that it 
>introduced the 2-liter package size to the U.S. market. Isn't it time for 
>the industry as a whole to take full advantage of metric-system simplicity 
>for its customers?  There is a way!
>
>As you know, the metric system is the preferred system of measurement for 
>trade and commerce in the United States (Metric Conversion Act of 1975, 
>amended 1988). However, the federal Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) 
>continues to require both metric and U.S. customary units to appear on 
>product labels.  I am writing to ask you to support the concept of amending 
>the FPLA to allow you the OPTION of labeling your products in metric units 
>only.
>
>The people of the U.S. are ready for this choice. The simple statement "500 
>mL" is listed alone on supermarket shelf tags and featured on electronic 
>store marquees. At your option (meaning, at no cost to you),  and based on 
>the legal national preference for metric, it should be able to stand alone 
>on your U.S. product labels.
>
>The U.S. Metric Association (USMA), Inc., is a non-profit, national 
>organization, founded in 1916, and dedicated to U.S. adoption of the metric 
>system as the Nation's primary system of measurement.  We believe that it is 
>time for the U.S. to implement fully the international measurement standard. 
>Establishing a metric-only labeling option would be a sensible beginning for 
>the changeover, and would certainly be easier on the eyes of the American 
>beverage consumer.
>
>Thank you very much for your kind attention.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
>Public Relations Director
>U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
>www.metric.org
>3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
>Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>________________
>aquafinalabel.jpg (685k bytes)

Reply via email to