On Saturday 31 March 2007 13:35, Bill Hooper wrote: > Both MPG (or km/L) and L/100 km (or gal/100 mi, for that matter) make > reasonable sense in the way they may be used, ESPECIALLY if the one > in question is the one you are familiar with using. And they are > equally easy to use once one is familiar with them.
I know that in France they use L/100 km. But in accordance with the rule of 1000, shouldn't it be L/Mm? The figure will be ten times as big. To convert between fuel efficiency and fuel consumption, you take the reciprocal. You should know some reciprocals from learning basic arithmetic. 25 km/L is 40 L/Mm, 70 km/L is about 14 L/Mm, etc. Pierre
