Re: [USMA:38469] Re: Unexpected appearance of SI in US mediaThe problem with 
cooking arises when I am confronted with American recipes - what is a "stick of 
butter"? I havn't got a clue.  In the UK, we buy our butter in 250g or 500g 
packs.  The "Concise Oxford Dictionary" devotes a whole page to the word 
"stick", but I am left none the wiser.  On the other hand, a French recipe 
might have "100 g buerre" I can look up the meaning of "buerre" in any 
English-French dictionary.  This, I think, illustrates the need to use a 
consistent set of units across the nations of the earth.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Jason Wentworth 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:44 PM
  Subject: [USMA:38475] Re: Unexpected appearance of SI in US media


  *Sigh*  When I prepare tomato soup for lunch, I add one can of water (using 
the soup can, as instructed on the label) to the condensed soup in the sauce 
pan, then heat it on simmer, stirring occasionally.

  That's not a scientific experiment, just a meal, and the units used in 
preparing it are irrelevent to me as well as to 99.999% of other people who 
prepare similar cans of soup.  (Other recipes do require greater precision in 
ingredient quantities, temperatures, and cooking times, of course).  But even 
then, the choice of units is irrelevant.  What matters is that they be 
consistently used in a recipe.

  The same is true for most of the daily activities of most people--it doesn't 
matter what units (if any) they actively use as long as they are from the same 
system or collection of units.


  --  Jason
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Pat Naughtin 
    To: U.S. Metric Association 
    Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:26 PM
    Subject: [USMA:38470] Re: Unexpected appearance of SI in US media


    On 2007 04 21 2:42 PM, "James Jason Wentworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


      Many people even in metric countries (cooks, carpenters, plumbers, etc.) 
don't consider *all* measurement scientific.  --  Jason




    Dear Jason,

    I think that the Marquis de Condorcet (1743/1794) put it rather well when 
he referred to the metric system as:

    'A tous les peuples; a tous les temps'
    ('For all people; for all time') 


    Together with the developers of the metric system in the 1790s he believed 
that the metric system was for everyone - and in all activities.

    They were aware that nothing affects human activities so much as the choice 
of the methods of measurement. No other aspect of our behavior influences the 
course of human activity so directly and so universally. I think that this was 
recognised by the developers of the metric system when they adopted the Marquis 
de Condorcet's motto.

    Looking at this a little more broadly, it seems that there are four 
universal methods of written communication.

    The four methods that cross all language barriers are:

    q the way of writing notes for music,

    q the set of mathematical signs and symbols,

    q the symbols for chemical elements, and

    q the International System of Units (SI).

    These four methods can be understood wherever you are in the world and 
whatever language you use to speak and to write. It doesn't even matter if you 
write with an alphabet or you use pictograms; you will still be able to 
understand these four international methods.

    Cheers,

    Pat Naughtin
    PO Box 305, Belmont, 3216
    Geelong, Australia
    Phone 61 3 5241 2008

    Pat Naughtin is the editor of the free online monthly newsletter, 
'Metrication matters'.
    Subscribe at http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter

    Pat is recognised as a Lifetime Certified Advanced Metrication Specialist 
(LCAMS) with the United States Metric Association. He is also editor of the 
'Numbers and measurement' section of the Australian Government Publishing 
Service 'Style manual - for writers, editors and printers'. He is a Member of 
the National Speakers Association of Australia and the International Federation 
for Professional Speakers. See: http://www.metricationmatters.com 

    This email and its attachments are for the sole use of the addressee and 
may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. This 
email and its attachments are subject to copyright and should not be partly or 
wholly reproduced without the consent of the copyright owner. Any unauthorised 
use of disclosure of this email or its attachments is prohibited. If you 
receive this email in error, please immediately delete it from your system and 
notify the sender by return email.

Reply via email to