793 g? That was a VERY premature birth ... -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Mike Millet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I was 30cm long and weighed in at 793g when I was born if I remember correctly from my hospital records. And since this is in New York all measures were in Si with no inch equivalents. Mike On 7/18/07, Carleton MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My two kids, born in 1984 and 1986, were 3690 g and 4390 g, respectively. That's all that appeared on their California birth certificate registration forms, and that's how Kaiser Permanente showed it on the "It's a Boy!" cards on the bassinettes. I never learned what these are in wombat and don't want to learn. Carleton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Payne Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 13:56 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:39093] Re: A Metric Birth My daughter was 2,9 kg. Not sure of the length. That was over 19 years ago. I've got some movie with me saying when she grows up metric is all we'll be using. It still amazes me how wrong I was! Mike Payne ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Palumbo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" < [email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:13 Subject: [USMA:39092] A Metric Birth > My sister just gave birth to a healthy baby girl. > > She's exactly 50 cm in length and 3 kilograms in weight. :) (Slightly on > the small side, but they induced labour before the full term.) > > Just thought I'd share! > > Cheers, > Mike > > (I'm an uncle now!) > -- "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"
