Yep I was 3 months early. Was supposed to be a December baby and came in
September.


Mike

On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

793 g?  That was a VERY premature birth ...


-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Mike Millet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I was 30cm long and weighed in at 793g when I was born if I remember
correctly from my hospital records.

And since this is in New York all measures were in Si with no inch
equivalents.

Mike


On 7/18/07, Carleton MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My two kids, born in 1984 and 1986, were 3690 g and 4390 g,
> respectively.
> That's all that appeared on their California birth certificate
> registration
> forms, and that's how Kaiser Permanente showed it on the "It's a Boy!"
> cards
> on the bassinettes.  I never learned what these are in wombat and don't
> want
> to learn.
>
> Carleton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf
> Of Michael Payne
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 13:56
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:39093] Re: A Metric Birth
>
> My daughter was 2,9 kg. Not sure of the length. That was over 19 years
> ago.
> I've got some movie with me saying when she grows up metric is all we'll
> be
> using. It still a! mazes m e how wrong I was!
>
> Mike Payne
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Palumbo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" < [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:13
> Subject: [USMA:39092] A Metric Birth
>
>
> > My sister just gave birth to a healthy baby girl.
> >
> > She's exactly 50 cm in length and 3 kilograms in weight. :)  (Slightly
> on
> > the small side, but they induced labour before the full term.)
> >
> > Just thought I'd share!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mike
> >
> > (I'm an uncle now!)
> >
>
>


--
"The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"




--
"The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"

Reply via email to