On 2007 07 25 1:57 PM, "Remek Kocz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Great presentation.  I really enjoyed seeing Pat speak, finally having a
> chance to meet the man who is a bit of a celebrity among us.  Pat drove home a
> number of good points, with some excellent examples of how social pressure can
> affect the usage of metric.  It was a pleasure to be able to talk to Pat and
> Stephen.  All well worth the drive from the US.
> 
> Remek

Dear Remek,

Thanks for your support. I appreciate your kind remarks.

I enjoyed meeting you in Toronto and also all of the others who I only know
from the internet ‹ what an enthusiastic group of metrication  supporters.

I am in Washington and looking forward to speaking at NIST tomorrow. Others
can find the details at http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/#naughtin

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216
Geelong, Australia
61 3 5241 2008

Pat Naughtin is manager of http://www.metricationmatters.com an internet
website that focuses on the many issues, methods and processes that
individuals, groups, companies, and nations use when upgrading to the metric
system. Contact Pat Naughtin at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


> On 7/21/07, Stephen Gallagher  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Another talk by Pat Naughtin, Metrication Specialist from Australia, who is
>>> on a world tour.  This talk is sponsored by the Canadian Metric Association
>>> (CMA), to be held on July 20 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada  in case any
>>> listserver subscribers are close enough to be able to attend.
>> I was able to attend Pat's presentation last night at the University of
>> Toronto.  I wish that there had been more attendees, but it was a Friday
>> night, during our short Canadian summer, so I can understand why some people
>> might have had other activities that they wanted to do.
>> 
>> Remek was also there, and it nice to put a face to the name.
>> 
>> It still was a nice presentation about what Australia did right in
>> metricating, and how they did it.
>> 
>> Thanks Pat.
>> 
>> Stephen Gallagher
>> Toronto
>> 
> 


Reply via email to