Here is the reply I received by the author of the article on the new electron microscope (using angstom units). It is hopeful but somewhat discouraging that he feels a "gradual transition" is acceptable. I replied to this and my reply is attached below.

Regards,
Bill Hooper

Mr. Preuss's reply to my earlier message:
===========================================
On 2008 Jan 23 , at 12:20 PM, Paul Preuss wrote:

You're not alone in urging me to use picometers not angstroms, and in future we will move in this direction. Among the working scientists at NCEM, angstroms are far from obsolete, and for many years we have written about electron microscope resolution and measurements on the atomic scale in terms of angstroms and fractions thereof, a unit of measure most of our readers are accustomed to. (I suspect that you, like me, are old enough to remember how long it took to persuade people to change to hertz from cycles per second, and all the bad jokes that change inspired.)

So we will have to make the transition gradually, but rest assured, the next time I write about this, picometers will come first.
===========================================


My new reply to him:
===========================================

On 2008 Jan 23 , at 12:20 PM, Paul Preuss wrote:
... angstroms are far from obsolete, ... (they are) a unit of measure most of our readers are accustomed to.
...
... So we will have to make the transition gradually, ...

I understand your position completely but I would hope the transition could be made more rapidly.

The ONLY thing difficult about such a change is the transition period. Deliberately making the transition period shorter (so that people can "get used to" the new way) is the best way to make the whole process easier. So long as the old, familiar units are tolerated, many people will not learn the "new way" but will continue to fall back on them just because they are old and familiar. That leads to a long period when some are using one and some are using the other. THAT is where the real difficulty lies.

I continue to hope that the above arguments would be heard and accepted by those who have the ability to make the changes happen.

... but rest assured, the next time I write about this, picometers will come first.


That is good to hear. Thank you.

===========================================

Reply via email to