Bill, Martin & all:
>In the case of calculating 1 Ms, I realized that 86400 x 11 was a little>under 
>10^6 while 86400 x 12 was a little over 10^6. My earlier contributions during 
>1970-71....onwards reflected THIS aspect, as listed are: 
http://brijvij.com/eBookCopyrights-n-Patent_ParliamentaryReferences.doc
If we go by the proposed Metric Second (1973), A Quinto-Day (5-day interval 
would be: (5*20)*100mm*100sm is 10^6 metric seconds.
However, I have for the time, now shelved the ideas in favour of 
24hx100mdx100sd i.e. the day-night be of 2*12 hours as existing now, with 
100x100 sub-divisions of the hour. Please see: 
http://www.brijvij.com/bb_deci-sec-nu-mtr.pdf
Regards,Brij Bhushan Vij (MJD 2454554)/995+D-047W12-05 (G. Friday, 2008 March 
28 H 22:11(decimal) IST Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda Jan:31; 
Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30 Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; 
Dec:30 (365th day of Year is World Day) HOME PAGE: 
http://www.brijvij.com/******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendaar*****"Koi bhi 
cheshtha vayarth nahin hoti, purshaarth karne mein hai"Contact # 011-9818775933 
(M)001(201)962-3708(when in US)> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
[email protected]> Subject: [USMA:40691] RE: Promoting Metrication> Date: Thu, 
27 Mar 2008 21:31:21 +0000> > Bill,> > My start point was that there are 86400 
seconds in a day. I calculated this> some years ago when I was working out the 
best way to represent time in a> computer and I noticed that you could not 
represent the time of day using a> 16 bit unsigned integer.> > In the case of 
calculating 1 Ms, I realized that 86400 x 11 was a little> under 10^6 while 
86400 x 12 was a little over 10^6.> > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of Bill Potts> Sent: 27 March 
2008 01:15> To: U.S. Metric Association> Subject: [USMA:40684] RE: Promoting 
Metrication> > I was about to correct you when I read your own correction.> > I 
always remember that 1 Ms is 11 days, 13 hours, 46 minutes, 40 seconds,> 
because I set myself a challenge, when I was in my teens, to calculate it in> 
my head. There any many things about my teens that I've happily forgotten> 
(mostly very embarrassing stuff), but not that.> > Bill> 
________________________________> Bill Potts> Roseville, CA> http://metric1.org 
[SI Navigator] > > > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of Martin Vlietstra> Sent: Wednesday, 
March 26, 2008 14:40> To: U.S. Metric Association> Subject: [USMA:40683] RE: 
Promoting Metrication> > Oops, 11 days is about 1 Ms, so 100 Ms is about 3 
years.> > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of Martin Vlietstra> Sent: 26 March 2008 21:35> To: U.S. 
Metric Association> Subject: [USMA:40682] RE: Promoting Metrication> > 100 Ms? 
That is about every 11 days :-)> > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of Bill Potts> Sent: 26 March 
2008 20:41> To: U.S. Metric Association> Subject: [USMA:40680] RE: Promoting 
Metrication> > Martin:> > Nobody is denying the status of the word "metric," as 
a noun, OUTSIDE the> scope and context of SI.> > However, WITHIN the scope and 
context of SI, "metric" is only ever used as> an adjective.> > Outside SI, 
"metric" does not refer to a standard, but to a means. "Metrics"> typically 
consist of counts and percentages (and, often, very subjective> ones). Where 
those who use the term "metrics" need to use units of measure,> there is no 
implicit standard that determines what those units will be.> Here, of course, 
we hope they'll use SI units (and, in almost all other> countries, they would 
do so as a matter of course), but that's beside the> point.> > This, by the 
way, is a topic we dealt with on this list over 10 years ago. I> guess it does 
need to be brought up, though, from time to time (maybe every> 100 Ms or so).> 
> Bill> ________________________________> Bill Potts> Roseville, CA> 
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] > > > -----Original Message-----> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of Martin Vlietstra> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 13:03> To: U.S. Metric Association> Subject: 
[USMA:40679] RE: Promoting Metrication> > Gene,> > Metric is a noun as well as 
an adjective. Consider the following sentence> "The metrics used to describe 
the technological development of a nation> include energy consumption per 
capita, GNP per capita, number of cars,> telephone, TV sets etc per capita". > 
> Martin> > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 26 March 2008 18:17> To: U.S. 
Metric Association> Subject: [USMA:40676] Promoting Metrication> > Ernie,> > I 
applaud your efforts to promote metrication in the USA!> > However, please *do 
consider* Bill Potts message below.> > The word "metric" is an adjective.> > 
Appropriate terms for USMA objectives are "metric units" or "metric system"> or 
"metric system of units"; or the symbol SI for each of the above terms.> > The 
word "metrics" is a noun, unrelated to SI in particular, although it is> widely 
used as Bill explains below to access performance of a campaign or> process.> > 
Gene Mechtly.> > ---- Original message ----> >Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:28:05 
-0700> >From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >Subject: [USMA:40674] RE: 
Furthering Metrics> >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>> >> > 
Ernie:> > > > Did you miss my recent message about the use of the> > term 
"metrics?"> > > > Basically, it said that the word "metrics" appears> > nowhere 
in official documentation on the metric> > system or in related standards 
documentation.> > Rather, it's a non-technical term, unrelated to the> > metric 
system, that refers, broadly, to the means by> > which one measures the 
effectiveness of something> > (e.g., an advertising campaign).> > > > Metric, 
as used in the context of the Modern Metric> > System (SI) is an adjective and, 
therefore, is never> > written in the plural.> > > > The goal of organizations 
like the US Metric> > Association is to further the use of the Modern> > Metric 
System (which, of course, involves the use of> > metric units).> > > > Please 
accept this as information, not as criticism.> > > > Bill Potts> >> > 
------------------------------------------------> >> > Bill Potts> > Roseville, 
CA> > http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]> 
_________________________________________________________________
In a rush?  Get real-time answers with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_realtime_042008

Reply via email to