Paul,

Section 176 is sufficiently pro-metric that I doubt than any prosecutor in New 
York State would be willing to challenge labels which are metric-only!  Thanks 
for the quotation.
Yes. Why does the N.Y. State Dept. of Agriculture delay?

Gene.
---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:55:48 -0600
>From: Paul Trusten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject: [USMA:40707] current New York state law supports metrication  
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>...
>    ยง 176. Declaration of policy and purpose. The legislature hereby finds
>  and  declares that voluntary and orderly conversion to the metric system
>  of weights and measures is of vital importance to  the  economy  of  the
>  state.  It  is  hereby declared to be the public policy of this state to
>  encourage the gradual implementation of the metric system throughout the
>  state's  government,  industry,  commerce,   business,   education   and
>  agriculture. This article is enacted in the exercise of the public power
>  in  order to encourage such implementation and to provide a revised code
>  of weights and measures which will be  responsive  to  the  present  and
>  future  needs of commerce, industry and consumers. The legislature finds
>  and declares that the coordination and administration  of  this  unitary
>  regulatory  system  governing  weights and measures throughout the state
>  should be, and is hereby, vested in the commissioner of agriculture  and
>  markets  and that enforcement of this article by the counties and cities
>  of the state shall be under his supervision.
>...

Reply via email to