Don't forget about the ever-more-numerous people who "loose" their luggage.

As I've mentioned before, I thought "metric" descended from the Latin 
"metricus", which supposedly
meant "relating to measurement".  That's virtually the same as the modern 
non-SI-related
definition.  I always thought the use of the word to refer to a particular 
system of measurement
was the more recent innovation.  The "cost function" definition of metric is as 
familiar to me as
the SI definition.  I hear other engineers and physicists use it all the time.

Almost certainly "metric" as a noun has meant something similar but not 
identical to "quantity by
which things are measured" in mathematics jargon for a good while.  According 
to Wikipedia, the
term "metric space" was invented by Hausdorff, who died in 1942.  So it seems 
likely to have been
around for at least 60-70 years.

I really don't see why this one bothers people.  It appears to have a pretty 
sensible etymology. 
Is it just because the two meanings might get mixed up?

--- "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Give it time, and Webster will add the new use of the word. It bugs me, too, 
> but
> I have given in to the notion that language is what people make of it. I just
> hope they don't legitimize the use of the apostrophe in forming a plural 
> (i.e.,
> "chicken's" instead of "chickens.")  This error is so common that Webster 
> might
> legitimize it the same way they did with the mispronunciations of "February"
> (feb-YOO-ary) and "nuclear" (NOOK-yoo-lar).
> 
> (If I live to be a thousand, I will never say "NOOK-yoo-lar," no many how many
> scholars say it and point confidently to a dictionary.)
> 
> By now (gag me with a spoon!) there should be a new shade of meaning to
> "awesome."  Strictly speaking, "cool" means "lacking warmth," but it surely
> means, "attractive" or "especially interesting."
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting Norman & Nancy Werling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > My most recent dictionary is the Webster's New World Dictionary, Second
> > College Edition.  It does not mention a new use of these two words which are
> > now used so often in contexts other than referring to the International
> > System of Measures (SI).
> >
> > When, how, and why did a new use of the subject words become applicable
> > to---how best to say it---references to general ways to approach, study,
> > analyze, or decide things?
> >
> > Norman Werling
> 
> 
> --
> 
> DIGNITY, SELF-RESPECT, AND INTEGRITY
> IN PHARMACY
> 
> Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
> Acting Secretary
> Phone +1(432)528-7724
> The Pharmacy Alliance
> 3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122
> Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://oleapothecary.blog.com
> 
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Reply via email to