Yeah, I saw that. That's such a shame, because they're really grasping at 
straws. The metric system is fine in day-to-day life. People think meters are 
too big? Every person in every other country would think feet are too small. 
And if metrication were done correctly the pole would be rounded down to 3 
meters. ;)

People always tell me that we shouldn't transition because people don't want 
it, but I say that people don't know what they want. If people were educated 
about the metric system, and I mean everyone and not just students, then the 
stigma would go away.

--- On Sat, 1/10/09, Victor Jockin <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Victor Jockin <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:42287] Re: the metric system, bureaucracy, and, uh, sodomy?
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, January 10, 2009, 6:07 PM



 
 

Here's another amusing one that I found on the Hannity forum 
that Paul mentioned a while back.  Maybe some of you saw it:


  Every country that uses metrics is either Socialist, Fascist 
  or Communist. I don't want to give up our Republican form of government just 
  so some engineers don't have to use a calculator. Metricfied expressions 
like: 
  "I wouldn't touch that with a 3.048 meter pole" doesn't make sense and seems 
  dumb to say. What about membership in the "1760 Meter High Club"? It sounds 
  stupid!

Say NO to metrics!
There's a pretty strong positive relationship between support 
for metrication and educational attainment.  Also, social conservatives are 
generally fearful of instability or change.  Those two attributes -- low 
intelligence, and a belief the world is full of scary people who must be 
stopped 
-- produces some hilarious prose.  Now if only there were fewer such people 
out there.
  




From: Paul Trusten 
Sent: 01/10/2009 9:30 AM
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:42286] the metric system, bureaucracy, and, uh, 
sodomy?


What we'll be confronting as U.S. metrication approaches--extracted from a 
corner of Facebook:
 
WHY PEOPLE HATE IT

There is a good reason why 
people only adopt the metric system when they are forced to by unjust, 
bureaucratic governments:

Because it is inferior, for day-to-day use. 
Systems which naturally evolved for the convenience of the user are almost 
always better than systems set up by ivory tower academics, and this is a 
perfect example of that.

 


  
  
    

    
      
        
        
          
            Virginia D. Templeton 
            wrote
at 3:34pm on January 6th, 2009
            The metric system is of the 
            Devil. It was, after all, created by a cabal of God-hating French 
            sodomites to make their genitalia sound bigger when bragging to 
            potential same-sex "lovers" with the hope of picking them up for a 
            night of wicked, debauched, feces-smeared buggery in the back room 
            of some rat-infested "fromagerie." God hates it.
             
            I just thought I'd offer this up, because there 
            are a lot of people in the U.S. who missed, or preferred to miss, 
            the entire 1970s U.S. metrication movement, and will find 
            21st-century metrication just as objectionable, with the old 
            religious and armchair-mathematics objections 
            resurfacing.   Unfortunately, "metric system" is a phrase 
            that is still used either as a threat or as a joke among Americans. 
            We shall need strong leadership to take us to our 
        goal.
Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric 
Association, Inc.
www.metric.org    
3609 
Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
[email protected]



      

Reply via email to