The single apostrophe is the symbol for seconds of arc.

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Jeremiah MacGregor
Sent: 31 January 2009 04:43
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:42660] Re: REALLY using the SI

 

Mark,

 

Don't some disciplines use an apostrophe to separate numbers into groups?

 

123'456'789.123'456'789

 

Why not use it everywhere?  

 

I don't like commons or points as number separators.  They can to easily be
confused with another.  I prefer the point as a decimal marker only because
I'm use to it.  But when encountered, I have no problem with the comma.  I
prefer also to see a zero before a decimal number less then 1.  

 

Jerry

 

  _____  

From: Mark Simon <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:16:08 PM
Subject: [USMA:42623] Re: REALLY using the SI


With regard to semantics, I would like to mention the use of the comma
as decimal separator. I am sure that most of us are aware that comma
"," is used to separate integers from the tenths in Europe as opposed
to the period "." which is used in USA. Thousands, Millions, etc. are
separated by a space as opposed to the comma. Mechtly has separated
the thousand in the European manner.

When I purchased nuts for my honda recently it was labeled as:
M8-1.25, but the bolts I used to test the thread were labeled as:
M8-1,25.

Does SI specify the punctuation as to the decimal and thousands separators?

On 1/27/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Aaron,
>
> Agreed, the ton is a unit of mass.  Eventually, I hope,
> a "metric ton," defined as exactly 1 000 kilograms, will be known simply
as
> a ton, identical to a tonne in some languages.
>
> I favor this use of the word "ton" ;not adoption of the Mg.
>
> Is this your first posting here?  Welcome!
>
> Gene.
>
>
>
> ---- Original message ----
>>Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:39:25 -0700
>>From: Aaron Harper <[email protected]>
>>Subject: [USMA:42608] Re: REALLY using the SI
>>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>>Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>>
>>  I can't let this one go without making a comment.
>>
>>  Ships are measured in tons (units of Mass) of water
>>  displaced by the ship.  Even though a given tonnage
>>  ship displaces a specific volume of water, this is
>>  not a volume mesurement.
>>
>>  Refrigeration unit capacities are rated by the
>>  amount (again units of Mass) of ice created (or
>>  frozen) per unit of time.  Usually, here in the USA,
>>  this unit is presently given in tons.  It is not a
>>  measure of the energy or heat required.
>>
>>  Respectfully,
>>
>>  Aaron Harper
>
>

 

Reply via email to