Pat,

You must have missed my follow-up response to Martin.  I agree with your point. 
 But if you consider that the metric is changed to imperial, then rounded to 
make the imperial look user friendly and then later reconverted to metric; the 
reconverted metric may be different then the original figures.  Hence the 
confusion as to which units may be more correct, even though both can be wrong 
to a degree.

Does this make sense?

Jerry



________________________________
From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2009 3:28:51 PM
Subject: [USMA:42953] RE: Aussie fires


Dear Jerry,

All the original data was measured in metric units, recorded in metric units, 
communicated in metric units, and then dumbed down by the Yahoo journalist 
presumably because the journalist is catering to those he or she regards as the 
retarded people in the UK and in the USA who can't cope with 17th century 
progress. You might like to listen to the streaming of the fire emergency radio 
radio station at http://www.abc.net.au/melbourne for a few minutes where all 
official measuring is reported in metric units - only.

Dear Martin and Harry,

Thanks for your thoughts. It will be a hard time for us as we recover from this 
disaster.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia
70 kilometres from the nearest fire

On 2009/02/09, at 3:55 AM, Jeremiah MacGregor wrote:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090208/ap_on_re_au_an/as_australia_wildfires


The link from Yahoo puts the English units first and the metric second.  I 
think there are some conversion errors so I'm not sure which is correct, the 
English or the metric.

Jerry







From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2009 4:18:51 AM
Subject: [USMA:42945] RE: Aussie fires


[off topic]
After I left this conference a few minutes ago (09:15 GMT), I visited the
BBC website - http://news.bbc.co.uk/.  The pictures of the Aussie bush-fires
were horrific.  

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Harry Wyeth
Sent: 08 February 2009 08:12
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:42944] Aussie fires


I am sure we all send our sympathies to our Aussie friends, including 
Pat, for the terrible fires they are experiencing.  And I see that their 
temps hit 47º--same as we had in Northern California two summers ago.  
If you have never been that hot--well, it is really, really hot.  It 
made our swimming pool hit 34º at one point.

Carry on, Mate.

See:

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090208/D9677UMO0.html

HARRY WYETH


Pat Naughtin wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> As I advised yesterday we were in for a hot dry day with low humidity 
> yesterday; the prediction was for 44 °C. It turned out that the 
> temperature at the Avalon airport near Geelong was the hottest place 
> in the state. The temperature there reached 46.9°C at 15:00 with winds 
> gusting between 10 km/h and 60 km/h. 
> See http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDV60801/IDV60801.94854.shtml 





Pat Naughtin
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat 
at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' 
newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe. 



      

Reply via email to