Earlier in the week there were reports on the fires on NBC news.  These were 
all that I saw, and everything was spoken in English units.  The reporters were 
Americans (American accents) and when Australians were interviewed, no 
measurements were spoken.  Thus to the American audience, the entire experience 
was English all of the way.  

If an Australian had spoken metric, that part was edited out.  

I don't know how Americans would feel if they heard Australians speaking 
English but using metric units in normal speech.  They may expect English units 
when speaking English and may become disoriented if that wasn't the case.  

Maybe someone else may have heard or seen differently on other news channels.

Jerry



________________________________
From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Cc: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 7:55:17 PM
Subject: [USMA:42986] Re: hectare in a fire


Dear All,

Recently I referred to the fact that the size of bush fires bush fires are 
estimated and reported in hectares in Australia. In response:

On 2009/02/11, at 11:06 AM, STANLEY DOORE wrote:

Hi Pat et al:
    Thanks Pat for the fires update.  The fires there are getting TV time here 
in the US.
    This would be a good example of simplification if square kilometres was 
used instead of hectares.  km^2 would be so much more understandable, useful 
and would require much less computation, especially those of us in the United 
States who are converting to the SI.
    Our prayers are with you all.
Regards,  Stan Doore
The use of hectares works quite well for us in Australia. Basically, we use 
three area units for routine reporting of area measurements and estimates: 
square metres, hectares, and square kilometres.

*Residential land and house internal sizes are measured in square metres

*Farming land and bush fires are measured in hectares

*Mapping is done in square kilometres

These choices mean that all numerical reporting uses whole numbers without any 
need for fractions at all. No common or vulgar fractions and no decimals.

Only specialists such as cartographers have a need to change from one level of 
accuracy and precision to another. The public seems to quite happily just jump 
from one frame of reference to the next without any need for conversion 
algorithms or conversion factors. With respect, Stan, I think that this might 
be what you are referring to when you say that square kilometres would be so 
much more understandable. This might be the case if you are focused on doing 
conversions but it is not relevant when no conversions are done or thought to 
be necessary (except for specialists). Please note that Australians are used to 
working in millimetres (only) for all buildings (from kitchen renovations to 
multi-storey buildings) and almost all manufacturing, so Australian people are 
quite used to working with large numbers.

Even though they probably are not conscious of the reason, Australians benefit 
from the ease of working with whole numbers without fractions when they are 
considering the measurement of area on various scales. As I said the use of 
square metres, hectares, and square kilometres works pretty well for us.

By the way, while I am on the subject of measuring area, I can only think of 
two examples where I have had a need to use square centimetres in the past 10 
years. The first was when I wanted to estimate the mass of water in an 
aquarium. I measured the length and width to calculate the area of the base in 
square centimetres; and then used various depths of water in centimetres to 
calculate the volume at the various levels in cubic centimetres. From this I 
then calculated the mass of water using the idea that 1 cubic centimetre has a 
mass of 1 gram. Schools use square centimetres and cubic centimetres quite 
frequently, but I have not seen, or heard of them being used in any industrial 
or commercial settings. Schools also calculate cubic decimetres as the basis 
for the definition of a litre and for developing the relationship that a litre 
of water has a mass of a kilogram, but again, I have rarely seen this idea used 
in industry; the single example I can
 think of was for the estimation of the volume of water in a wool washing bath. 

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia

----- Original Message -----
From: Pat Naughtin
To: U.S. Metric Association
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:36 PM
Subject: [USMA:42978] Re: hectare in a fire
Dear All,

The good news is that the temperatures have dropped markedly in the last few 
days and forecasts are for similar lower temperatures, from the mid 20s to the 
low 30s, for the next week. There are even a few areas that might have 5 
millimetres to 10 millimetres in the next 24 hours. This will give the fire 
fighters from our Country Fire Authority (CFA) a chance to first of all contain 
and then to 'blacken' the fires that are still active. Wendy and I and our son, 
his wife, and grandchildren are all fine and well out of the range of any of 
the initial 200 fire outbreaks; the closest was about 70 kilometres away. Our 
only family worry is that Wendy's sister and her family have a fruit orchard 
and a vineyard in a valley near one of the major fires and they have been 
immersed in smoke since Saturday; the worry is that the smoke will effect the 
fruit and the grapes as some of these were almost ready for harvest.

Of these 200 original fires 11 of them were regarded as major fires and the 
'urgent' messages coming from the radio emergency service were more or less 
continuous through 24 hours of the day. Currently we still have about 35 fire 
locations that are still active and 3 of these are still major fires. There are 
still 'urgent' messages and 'alert' messages being issued from the CFA on a 
regular basis. Senior fire officers are now delivering hopeful messages of 
confidence that they will be able to control the remaining fires within the 
next week or two.. As usual our CFA has done a fantastic job. As have all of 
our other community groups who have supported the work of the fire fighters. 
People like the Country Women's Association (CWA), who suddenly turn up at 
remote locations in the middle of the bush on the edge of a major fires with 
generators for electricity, urns to boil water for tea and coffee, and the 
wherewithal for making thousands of sandwiches to
 give the fire fighters sustenance during the meal breaks that can happen at 
any time of day or night.

Could I suggest that you tune to the streaming radio station of the Australian 
Broadcasting Commission (ABC). This is a government radio station that normally 
broadcasts popular music and talk-back radio on political and legal issues, but 
when we have bush fires it changes to our emergency radio service. You will 
find this radio service at http://www.abc.net.au/melbourne and the reason I am 
suggesting that you do this is so that you can appreciate at a personal level 
the outpouring of support that has not only come from ordinary    people in the 
Australian community but also from the international community. The stories 
that you will hear will amaze and inspire you. I feel immensely proud to be 
part of the community of Victoria at this sad time.

As you probably know, the CFA of the state of Victoria has very good 
relationships with the states of California and Washington in the USA. It is 
not unusual for fire fighters from California and Washington to come here to 
help us with extended fires and for some of our 'fireys' to help out in the USA.

Another feature of this emergency fire service is that the reports from 
ordinary citizens are invariably given in metric units. It has been the policy 
of fire fighters here to use metric units since the 1970s and the stated reason 
for this was fire fighters' safety. In the Rural Fire Service (RFS) of the 
state of New South Wales it has been a 'reportable offence' to use old 
pre-metric measures at a fire location since the early 1970s. It took longer 
for the general community to adopt this practice but this in now widely 
accepted.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia

On 2009/02/08, at 11:18 AM, Pat Naughtin wrote:

Dear All,

As I advised yesterday we were in for a hot dry day with low humidity 
yesterday; the prediction was for 44 °C. It turned out that the temperature at 
the Avalon airport near Geelong was the hottest place in the state. The 
temperature there reached 46.9°C at 15:00 with winds gusting between 10 km/h 
and 60 km/h. See http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDV60801/IDV60801.94854.shtml 

Fortunately for us there were no bush fires within 50 kilometres of Geelong, 
but more than 200 fires were reported from other parts of the state of Victoria 
— 11 of these are regarded as major fires burning areas of up to 30 000 
hectares — these fires are still active.

One of the government owned radio stations (Australian Broadcasting Commission 
or ABC 774) becomes an emergency information service under these circumstances. 
You can listen to a streaming of this service from 
http://www.abc.net.au/melbourne where you will notice that almost all 
dimensions supplied use metric units including hectares for the size of fires. 
The exceptions come from some few people who phone in to the talk-back 
components. The fire services have, since the 1970s, regarded using old 
pre-metric measures as a reportable offence since it puts volunteer fire 
fighters lives at risk to use multiple methods of measurement. I think that the 
ABC does an excellent job of providing this emergency bush fire information - 
you might like to listen for a while to see how we manage this kind of service 
in Australia.

By the way, as I listen to the radio, I think of hectares like this:

1I hear of a fire that is estimated as 165 hectares
2I take the square root of the number: sqrt (165) = 13 (approx.)
3Multiply 13 by 100 = 1300 metres.
4I think of this is a fire that, as a square, would be about 1.3 kilometres by 
1.3 kilometres.

Let me repeat this for one of the larger fire that is estimated to be 30 000 
hectares

1I hear of a fire that is estimated as 30 000 hectares
2I take the square root of the number: sqrt (30 000) = 170 (approx.)
3Multiply 170 by 100 = 17 000 metres.
4I think of this is a fire that, as a square, would be about 17 kilometres by 
17 kilometres.

A square in this particular case works well enough because these fires were 
burning with north-westerly winds before a cool change arrived from the 
south-west in such a way that one edge of some large fires changed to the front 
of the fire. We are fortunate that the south-westerly change has meant that the 
temperature today has dropped for the western half of the state to the mid 20s. 
The lower temperatures mean higher humidity so these weather factors should be 
helpful to the roughly 3000 mostly volunteer fire fighters.
Pat Naughtin
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat 
at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' 
newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe. 



      

Reply via email to