I can see where the terms megalitre, gigalitre and teralitre would be less 
cumbersome for the public then their equivalents of cubic dekametres, cubic 
hectometres and cubic kilometres.

I can see the cubic units being used in scientific and engineering endeavors 
and the litre multiples for the common people.  We would all know they are the 
same but we can each choose to pick terms that are simple. 

Would anyone want to see petrol pumps selling by the cubic decimetre as opposed 
to the litre even though the cubic decimetre is a derived SI unit and the litre 
is not?  Can anyone see fuel consumption expressed as cubic decimetres per 
hundred kilometres?   

Jerry 




________________________________
From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:33:15 PM
Subject: [USMA:44561] Re: FPLA 2010

Dear Stan, 

In the Australian water supply industry, kilolitres, megalitres, and gigalitres 
are commonly used.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia


On 2009/04/10, at 7:40 PM, STANLEY DOORE wrote:


  I am NOT advocating larger multiple units than the kL (m^3).  Larger 
multiples than the kL would be too complex, cumbersome and not user-friendly.
  Virtually all people are accustomed to the L and submultiples thereof as they 
buy medicine and products in stores.
  The kL would be very useful for things such as rain barrels, ponds, stream 
flow and other every day things to which people can relate.  People can relate 
to the kL which is a clean and useful expression of everyday large volume.  In 
the case of river flow and water and sewage systems, the use of gallons per 
minute are incomprehensible because it has no easy direct relationship to SI 
volume whereas  kL (cubic meters) do.  The use of L and not kL is also 
incomprehensible for stream flow because the numbers are so large.
  The NIST should be the leader in advocating the use of kL in the public 
domain.  The cubic meter and multiples and submultiples thereof should be used 
in engineering and science.
  To be consistent, those who do not advocate the use of the kL for everyday 
use also should be against the use of the L and submultiples thereof.
  Stan Doore



----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 2:02 PM
Subject: [USMA:44488] Re: FPLA 2010




Stan and Pierre,


I think you have some good arguments for allowing larger multiples of the liter 
in *common parlance*.


If you are able to persuade the CCU, CIPM, and NIST to accept multiples greater 
than one, I'll be among the last to object, but in Science and Technology, I'm 
with John.  The coherence of SI is more important, without the liter and its 
multiples, except, perhaps, in medical practice.


Gene.



---- Original message ----

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:39:48 -0400

From: Pierre Abbat <[email protected]>

Subject: [USMA:44483] Re: FPLA 2010

To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>



On Wednesday 08 April 2009 08:32:21 STANLEY DOORE wrote:

I disagree with the NIST in the case of kL because L is used widely and

well known  in the public sector.   Are you suggesting that mm^3 be used

instead of L? Stan Doore


I too disagree with the NIST. A liter is a cubic decimeter, a kiloliter is a

cubic meter, a megaliter is a cubic decameter, a gigaliter is a cubic

hectometer, a teraliter is a cubic kilometer, a petaliter is a cubic - what?

You can't express the petaliter as the cube of a named unit. Likewise the

exaliter. Contrariwise, you can't express the cubic yottameter or cubic

zeptometer as a prefixed liter.


As to the tonne, I wouldn't use it with any prefix. There are so many kinds of

tons and tuns that just saying "tonne" instead of "megagram" is not worth the

loss of clarity.


The stere has been deprecated, but I think it's still useful as a jargon unit,

since it has only one syllable compared to four for both alternatives.. I

still sometimes think in steres, since my father grew up with the unit.


Pierre




Pat Naughtin

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. 
See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ or to get the free 'Metrication matters' 
newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.



      

Reply via email to