Indeed, there is a prefix error.  This "facts & figures" page
http://www.barwonwater.vic.gov.au/cms/serveDoc.cfm?docId=24911
indicates Barwon water supplies 32000 ML of water annually, processes 21000 ML 
of sewage, and serves 270000 customers (that is apparently population, as 
household connections is less than half that, 131000).  Thus average household 
use is therefore around 244 m³ per year.
 
A thousand-fold error should cause a "whoa, wait a minute" response.  I believe 
the fact that it didn't is adequate evidence that megaliters, gigaliters, and 
teraliters (even with "re" spelling) are not very intuitive units and throw a 
great cloud of confusion over any attempt to visualize or sanity check the 
amount.  Any form of proper cubic measure, from 32 x 10^6 m³, 32 million cubic 
meters, 32000 dam³, 32 hm³, would be a more suitable way to convey this 
information, and be less likely to obscure a thousand-fold error.
 
Teraliters are frightening.


--- On Sat, 4/11/09, John M. Steele <[email protected]> wrote:

From: John M. Steele <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [USMA:44564] Re: FPLA 2010
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>, 
[email protected]
Date: Saturday, April 11, 2009, 8:59 AM







You have proven megaliters, gigaliters, and teraliters are used.  That is a 
staggering amount of water given Geelong's population.  Where does it all go? 
Irrigation?  If I compare with Detroit, private consumption and industry can't 
account for much.
 
A volume of 32 TL/annum meant absolutely nothing to me, a completely 
incomprehensible number.  Some manipulation led me to it being 32 km³ per year, 
giving me some sense of what you do to the river.  It also works out to a 
withdrawal of 1015 m³/s.
 
It still seemed large, so I compared it to the Detroit River (part of the 
connection between Lake Huron and Lake Erie, and the Detroit Water Dept, which 
serves a metro region of about 5 million people.
The Detroit River flow varies typically from 4500 m³/s in low lake level years 
to 6500 m³/s in high lake level years.  The Detroit Water department handles an 
average of 673 million gallons per day, by their figures.  Converting, this is 
0.93 TL (or km³) per year (29.5 m³/s) for 5 million people.  That figure is 
reasonably consistent with my household use of 273 m³/year)
 
As we use less than 1/32 the water for about 25X the population (is Geelong 
under 200,000?), I wonder if there isn't a prefix error in that news article. 
(If it isn't an error, you guys need more conservation effort!)

--- On Sat, 4/11/09, Pat Naughtin <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:44564] Re: FPLA 2010
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, April 11, 2009, 12:00 AM




On 2009/04/11, at 1:35 PM, Jeremiah MacGregor wrote:

I can see where the terms megalitre, gigalitre and teralitre would be less 
cumbersome for the public then their equivalents of cubic dekametres, cubic 
hectometres and cubic kilometres.





Dear Jerry and Stan,


Here is an example of the use of gigalitres from our local paper, The Geelong 
Advertiser, from October last year. Barwon Water is our local water supply 
organisation as we get most of our water from the Barwon river.


http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2008/10/24/26151_news.html 


Cheers,
 
Pat Naughtin


PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008


Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. 
See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact 
Pat at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication 
matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to 
subscribe.

Reply via email to