If the metric board were reconvened, I'd want to see some changes:
*The two reps each for labor and small business, and four for the consumer seem 
disproportionate compared to the other interests.  Four less members might make 
it work better.
*All members should be advocates for metrication from their respective sectors, 
and looking for the best way, not to be in opposition to the goal.
 
Otherwise, it will be another completely useless ineffective organization as it 
was previously.
--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Paul Trusten, R.Ph. <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Paul Trusten, R.Ph. <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:44617] U.S. Metric Board
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 11:04 AM

The coordinated, national U.S. metrication program is to be guided by the U.S.
Metric Board, which may still be appointed according to the Metric Conversion
Act of 1975. The Act states:



The Board shall consist of 17 individuals, as follows:

(1) the Chairman, a qualified individual who shall be appointed by the
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;

(2) sixteen members who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the
advice and consent of the Senate, on the following basis--

(A) one to be selected from lists of qualified individuals recommended by
engineers and organizations representative of engineering interests;

(B) one to be selected from lists of qualified individuals recommended by
scientists, the scientific and technical community, and organizations
representative of scientists and technicians;

(C) one to be selected from a list of qualified individuals recommended by the
National Association of Manufacturers or its successor;

(D) one to be selected from lists of qualified individuals recommended by the
United States Chamber of Commerce, or its successor, retailers, and other
commercial organizations;

(E) two to be selected from lists of qualified individuals recommended by the
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations or its
successor, who are representative of workers directly affected by metric
conversion, and by other organizations representing labor;

(F) one to be selected from a list of qualified individuals recommended by the
National Governors Conference, the National Council of State Legislatures, and
organizations representative of State and local government;

(G) two to be selected from lists of qualified individuals recommended by
organizations representative of small business;

(H) one to be selected from lists of qualified individuals representative of
the
construction industry;

(I) one to be selected from a list of qualified individuals recommended by the
National Conference on Weights and Measures and standards making organizations;

(J) one to be selected from lists of qualified individuals recommended by
educators, the educational community, and organizations representative of
educational interests; and

(K) four at-large members to represent consumers and other interests deemed
suitable by the President and who shall be qualified individuals.



--



Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association (USMA), Inc.
www.metric.org
3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to