The expression "gr." is an abbreviation, not a symbol, for "grain."  This is 
especially why the correct symbol for the gram must be used.  In metric 
education, if our young people were taught the principle of using a symbol, (as 
in currency, $ or €) instead of an abbreviation, for SI measurement units, 
future errors would be less likely.

Fortunately, in pharmacy we have the protection of common sense and plain old 
reality.   Contrary to the concerns shared with me from my fellow 
metricationists many times over the years, pharmacists do not read a 
prescription written for, say, "sucralfate 1 gr." and then attempt to compound 
65 mg capsules of the drug.  We know that the prescriber meant "1 g," or 1 gram 
(common sense), which is how this drug product is available commercially anyway 
(plain old reality).  So, in this instance, it is impossible for a patient to 
be underdosed or incovenienced.  (Incidentally, sucralfate is a 
prescription-drug carbohydrate that forms a covering over ulcerated portions of 
the stomach lining to protect it from further damage from stomach acid. Its 
original brand name was Carafate.).

Yes, we get that a lot in healthcare, and, in fact, the use of the correct 
symbol for the gram on written prescriptions is rare!  In community pharmacy 
practice, I would usually see "gm" or "gr." instead. For the milligram, I would 
often see "mgm."  Rest assured that all pharmacists see past these errors in 
symbolism.  The correct dose and the products are well known to us. 

In the U.S. recently, the Joint Commission, which is the accrediting body for 
all U.S. healthcare organizations, published a list of "abbreviations" (yes, JC 
does not yet have the symbol concept yet)  that must not be used in medical 
records. Contrary to proper SI usage, one of the expressions they banned was 
"µg," and in its place, substituted "mcg." JC's reason for this is that, when 
handwritten, "µg" could be mistaken for "mg."  The real problem here is the 
lack of metric education. In mathematics, from a young age, we are taught to 
recognize the symbols π or ϴ,but in measurement, we do not take the same 
approach to teaching , not only in the U.S., but also in metric countries, as 
Han has shown.  When it starts, U.S. metrication will give us an opportunity to 
teach Americans metric usage correctly. I only hope that we shall do so.

Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org    
3609 Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
Midland, Texas 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
[email protected]


 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Han Maenen 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: 10 May, 2009 06:31
  Subject: [USMA:45048] symbol for gram


  I visited a site about the teaching of arithmetic in Dutch primary schools. 
There was a page about a teachting method for primary arithmetic, in which I 
found an error in the subject called: 'Measurement'. For thge unit gram the 
wrong symbol gr. was used.

        7. Meten

        (Measurement)
       mm t/m km
        gr. – kg  - liter
        omtrek en oppervlakte
       Hele Metriek stelsel:
        mm tot km, ml tot kl
        mg tot kg, oppervlakte,
        inhoud
       Het kunnen hanteren
        van het totale schema
        van het metriekstelsel.
       

Reply via email to