I had much the same thought as you.  One simply doesn't try to put a 2.52" 
cable in 2.52" hole or trench.  Since they are now putting in a 2" cable, it 
needn't be a tight fit.  Of course, the story is filtered through a reporter 
who is perhaps innumerate.
 
Also, 2.52" seems like such an odd dimension to specify that I think it is most 
likely 64 mm.  Could the whole thing be a metric conversion error?

--- On Thu, 8/6/09, John Frewen-Lord <[email protected]> wrote:


From: John Frewen-Lord <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:45530] Re: I blew it! (The conversion of 2/100ths of an inch, 
that is)
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 2:32 AM


 
#yiv444933176 P {
MARGIN:0px;}


As a surveyor in the construction industry (and having worked in both imperial 
and metric in the UK, the US, Canada and South Africa), something about this 
story doesn't quite ring true.
 
1.  In-the-field tolerances are never less than 1/16" imperial (1.6 mm), or 1 
mm metric (at least I've never come across tolerances tighter than that, and 
that includes a lot of precision hospital work).  The 2/100ths of an inch is 
almost exactly 0.5 mm, a tolerance virtually impossible to achieve on a 
construction site.
 
2.  The 2.52" is almost exactly 64 mm.  Allowing for a tolerance of say +/- 1 
mm, the trench should have been specified at 65 mm.
 
3.  I'm no electrical expert, but I do know that cables when conducting 
electricity heat up and expand. Was no allowance made for this?  And would it 
not have been wise to allow a tiny bit of airpace between the cable and trench 
walls to allow air circulation and help the cable to stay cool(er)?
 
I wonder if there's more to this story than is being told?
 
Cheers
 
John F-L

----- Original Message ----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:07 AM
Subject: [USMA:45529] I blew it! (The conversion of 2/100ths of an inch, that 
is)


OK, I got my conversion wrong. But I bet we would be using whole numbers in 
millimiters if we were using and familiar with metric and had adopted 
millimeters for construction as Pat has observed works best in industry.

-- Ezra

Reply via email to