Well, I would beg to differ.....not that it matters.  The issue is closed as 
far as I'm concerned.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Potts 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:43 AM
  Subject: [USMA:45659] Re: Erm.....you may have noticed....


  Stephen Davis:

  Remek Kocz' comment is immediately above Brian White's reply to Simon Meng's 
post, which is immediately below Brian's reply.

  I don't think it could be clearer. Nothing you wrote is either within or 
below that sequence.

  Peace,

  Bill 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Bill Potts
  WFP Consulting
  Roseville, CA
  http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Stephen Davis
    Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 14:42
    To: U.S. Metric Association
    Subject: [USMA:45658] Re: Erm.....you may have noticed....


    Well, if that's the case, fair enough....my apologies.  It just seemed to 
be my post they were referring to, that's all.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Stephen Humphreys 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 10:01 PM
      Subject: RE: [USMA:45654] Erm.....you may have noticed....


      Steve. 


      They're taking about someone else (Simon meng)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      From: [email protected]
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: [USMA:45654] Erm.....you may have noticed....
      Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:31:39 +0100


      .....that my name isn't John/Kilopascal/euric OR Jeremiah!!  And I 
happened to be responding to a post from James Frysinger about metric and math 
(The post was a while ago, admittedly).

      No, my post wasn't DIRECTLY about metric, but it had a degree of 
relevance.

      The name, (NOT a psuedonym) happens to be Stephen Davis. I don't DO 
psuedonyms!  
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Remek Kocz 
        To: U.S. Metric Association 
        Cc: U.S. Metric Association 
        Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:20 PM
        Subject: [USMA:45652] Re: Maths (or should that be "math?")


        You noticed too, eh?


        On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Brian J White <[email protected]> 
wrote:

          Welcome back John/kilopascal/Eunic/Jeremiah!     I see you can't stay 
away for long.  :) 



          At 10:46 2009-08-14, [email protected] wrote:

            Amen!
             
            I beginning to wonder what kind of forum this is.  When a topic 
involving the metric system is brought up the responses are almost zero.  Talk 
about something other then the metric system or something loosely connected and 
then everybody joins in. 
             
            I hate to complain since I'm so new here but I came here to discuss 
the metric system and so far its not happening at the level I would like to 
see.  
             
            Simon  
             
             
             
             

            From: Aaron Harper 
            Sent: Friday, 2009-08-14 12:20
            To: U.S. Metric Association 
            Subject: [USMA:45624] Re: Maths (or should that be "math?")


            The question of whether decimals or fractions are better has 
nothing to do with the purpose of this forum: "Metrication."







--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Celebrate a decade of Messenger with free winks, emoticons, display pics, 
and more. Get Them Now 

Reply via email to