Stephen....welcome to email threads 101. It was painfully obvious
that everyone was referring to Simon Meng, and not you. Sheesh.
At 11:51 2009-08-17, Stephen Davis wrote:
Well, I would beg to differ.....not that it matters. The issue is
closed as far as I'm concerned.
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:[email protected]>Bill Potts
To: <mailto:[email protected]>U.S. Metric Association
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:43 AM
Subject: [USMA:45659] Re: Erm.....you may have noticed....
Stephen Davis:
Remek Kocz' comment is immediately above Brian White's reply to
Simon Meng's post, which is immediately below Brian's reply.
I don't think it could be clearer. Nothing you wrote is either
within or below that sequence.
Peace,
Bill
----------
Bill Potts
<http://wfpconsulting.com/>WFP Consulting
Roseville, CA
<http://metric1.org>http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
----------
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Stephen Davis
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 14:42
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:45658] Re: Erm.....you may have noticed....
Well, if that's the case, fair enough....my apologies. It just
seemed to be my post they were referring to, that's all.
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:[email protected]>Stephen Humphreys
To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 10:01 PM
Subject: RE: [USMA:45654] Erm.....you may have noticed....
Steve.
They're taking about someone else (Simon meng)
----------
From: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
Subject: [USMA:45654] Erm.....you may have noticed....
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:31:39 +0100
.....that my name isn't John/Kilopascal/euric OR Jeremiah!! And I
happened to be responding to a post from James Frysinger about
metric and math (The post was a while ago, admittedly).
No, my post wasn't DIRECTLY about metric, but it had a degree of relevance.
The name, (NOT a psuedonym) happens to be Stephen Davis. I don't DO
psuedonyms!
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:[email protected]>Remek Kocz
To: <mailto:[email protected]>U.S. Metric Association
Cc: <mailto:[email protected]>U.S. Metric Association
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:20 PM
Subject: [USMA:45652] Re: Maths (or should that be "math?")
You noticed too, eh?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Brian J White
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
Welcome back John/kilopascal/Eunic/Jeremiah! I see you can't
stay away for long. :)
At 10:46 2009-08-14, <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] wrote:
Amen!
I beginning to wonder what kind of forum this is. When a topic
involving the metric system is brought up the responses are almost
zero. Talk about something other then the metric system or
something loosely connected and then everybody joins in.
I hate to complain since I'm so new here but I came here to discuss
the metric system and so far its not happening at the level I would
like to see.
Simon
From: <mailto:[email protected]>Aaron Harper
Sent: Friday, 2009-08-14 12:20
To: <mailto:[email protected]>U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:45624] Re: Maths (or should that be "math?")
The question of whether decimals or fractions are better has nothing
to do with the purpose of this forum: "Metrication."
----------
Celebrate a decade of Messenger with free winks, emoticons, display
pics, and more. <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/>Get Them Now
