Stephen, you don't have to be 'anti' the opposite to what you are 'pro-' to, if 
that makes sense.In fact that position (IMHO) is more honourable, realistic and 
mature.  And it makes the argument less personal - again all IMHO.
I have my preferences but I'm definitely not anti-metric.  I find it difficult 
to envisage being against how something is measured.In fact I think we are in 
an enviable position of being able to choose from two well known systems in the 
UK (yes - I know that's going to invoke the 'mess' thing!). I choose imperial 
or metric depending on the job or situation in question.  I would never use 
fractions of inches (perhaps except half) and instead use whole millimetres 
which to me is preferable.  That particular choice is pro-metric.  It's not 
anti-Imperial, I simply think there's a better way in that instance.
Obviously if I am denied the choice then I must use whatever someone else has 
has decided is 'best for me'.  That's a position that - in the main - I wholly 
dislike.
The obvious reply by yourself, Stephen, is something like 'come off it - you're 
anti-metric' or something similar to that.  Of course you're free to have your 
opinion but it's an odd position to take to claim you would know my opinion 
despite what I truthfully say. I hope you don't do this though.
So I guess I am pro-imperial, pro-choice and pro-metric in that order of 
personal importance.

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46841] RE: Replacement of metric signs on I-19 (Arizona) deferred
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:57:32 +0000










"As a footnote - I always think you should concentrate on 
trade reasons for going metric. 
With roadsigns and the like it looks more 'anti-imperial' than 'pro-metric' 
and many people will just see it as some people's personal beef being played 
out 
at a national level - if that makes any sense.  Sort of "I hate those mile 
signs - make them say all 'k' & 'm' on them" versus "we've lost an order 
because the customer required metric - make them show metric".   That sort 
of thing."
 
But its entirely OK to be 'anti-metric'?  Also, isn't being 
'anti-imperial' to a large extent the main purpose of this discussion board, 
ie, 
to promote the usage of metric instead?



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Stephen 
  Humphreys 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:09 
  PM
  Subject: [USMA:46827] RE: Replacement of 
  metric signs on I-19 (Arizona) deferred
  
As a footnote - I always think you should concentrate on trade 
  reasons for going metric.
  With roadsigns and the like it looks more 'anti-imperial' than 
  'pro-metric' and many people will just see it as some people's personal beef 
  being played out at a national level - if that makes any sense.  Sort of 
  "I hate those mile signs - make them say all 'k' & 'm' on them" versus 
  "we've lost an order because the customer required metric - make them show 
  metric".   That sort of thing.
  

  However I will always say that you can usually tell how metric a country 
  is by what's on their road/public signs (ie it's part of the language)


  
  Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:19:44 -0800
From: 
  [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46824] RE: Replacement of metric 
  signs on I-19 (Arizona) deferred
To: [email protected]


  

  
  Gridlock works!
   
  I am happy, but I also realize it is insignificant in the bigger 
  picture.  Even having or not having metric signage defined in the MUTCD 
  is insignificant in the absence of a time-bounded plan to actually GO 
  metric.  Congress destroyed the plan and legislated against any new plan 
  circa 1995, with regards to roads.

  

  
  
  From: Stephen Humphreys 
  <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association 
  <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 6:23:40 
  AM
Subject: [USMA:46823] RE: 
  Replacement of metric signs on I-19 (Arizona) deferred


  
  I suspect you're quite happy about that - I would have 
  thought ;-)
 
Despite my normal position regarding this 
  subject I actually feel happy for you on this 
  occassion!  Congrats! 
 

  
  Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:20:05 -0800
From: 
  [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46815] Replacement of metric 
  signs on I-19 (Arizona) deferred
To: [email protected]


  

  
  Due to the lack of a plan, there is no plan.  Since they couldn't 
  decide exactly how to do it, they are not going to do it at all.
   
  Metric sign replacement on I-19 has been indefinitiely postponed, and the 
  funds
  committed to another project.
  
http://www.azstarnet.com/news/local/article_d7dec8f6-26f5-11df-b567-001cc4c03286.html

  
  Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us 
  now 

  
  We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us 
  now                                     
_________________________________________________________________
Tell us your greatest, weirdest and funniest Hotmail stories
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Reply via email to