In all honesty, I don't think they would include anything that forces anyone to change a package. As some producers use dry pints (mass is an allowed option), they would have to redesign, and the law couldn't become effective for a couple years after it passes, IF it passes. This should pass quietly and allow something that is not currently allowed, but NOT impose any new requirements. Since it only allows something new, it could be effective immediately or when producers are ready to do it. Any new requirement queers the deal (I think).
________________________________ From: Pierre Abbat <[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, June 27, 2010 5:12:51 PM Subject: [USMA:47984] Re: Fw: Re: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Tech Beat Update On Saturday 26 June 2010 06:53:50 John M. Steele wrote: > The NIST permissive metric-only press release is getting some > re-publication on food industry related sites: > http://www.foodproductdesign.com/news/2010/06/nist--proposes-metric-only-la >beling-for-some-products.aspx > > Their study showing some grocery stores are selling imported goods with > metric-only net contents (non-compliant with current FPLA) is interesting. > Given FMI's previous responses, I wonder if they will "excommunicate" these > stores for "crimes against humanity." I haven't seen any comments from FMI > yet. Where can we send comments? Besides wanting metric-only labels, I would like the dry pint abolished (my measuring cups have ounces on one side, but no dry pints), or at least such foods as cherry tomatoes and blueberries required to have grams on the label. Pierre -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman.
