I see that Steve is spouting yet more garbage.
 
"I've seen official 'pint' glasses with 'made in france' etched into the base! 
;-)"
 
He knows that the tolerances applied to any UK spirit, wine or beer capacity 
measure are set out in metric and checked by the Approved Verifier in metric, 
yet he still persists in his fantasy that foreign glass manufacturers use 
imperial measurement to manufacture UK pint glasses. Just because a measure 
says 
"pint" does not mean that it has been checked against an imperial standard.
 
He also "forgets" to mention that "pint" glasses (and other metric measures 
used 
in UK bars) are now CE marked instead of the old "crown" stamp. CE marked 
measures are accepted throughout Europe (wherever the sizes are legal for trade)
 
Has Stephen become a convert to EU standardization?
 
Finally, he fails to mention is that (apart from a few small niche 
manufacturers), all large scale UK "pint" glass production has now shifted to 
the Czech Republic & to France, as the 2 main UK manufacturers went into 
liquidation (bankruptcy) a few years ago.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-425868/EU-stealing-crown-great-British-pint.html

 
"The manufacture of most pint and half-pint glasses has been shifted to the 
Czech Republic, where costs are much lower."
 
I'd be far more surprised if Steve could find a new pint glass marked "made in 
the UK", but his "British is best" blinkers would never allow him to admit that 
any British business has failed. 


 
[USMA:47864] Re: Letter to the North Denver Tribune
Stephen Humphreys
Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:48:19 -0700

In my opinion:
An outsourcing company treats the possible 'outsourcee' as a potential 
customer.  If the customer want imperial (or customary, or whatever) then at 
the fear of losing a contract the external company will work to achieve such 
demands.
To use a similar example (not exactly the same but..) - I've seen official 
'pint' glasses with 'made in france' etched into the base! ;-)

Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:02:49 -0700
From: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:47863] Re: Letter to the North Denver Tribune
To: [email protected]



      

Reply via email to