(font change folks, the baton is handed over from Scotland to Ohio)
(Ask a simplistic question you know the answer to in order to get a perception 
of engagement with 'normal' pro-metric people.  All from a rather odd looking 
email address.)
Over to a normal person - Martin - are you sure that the law was passed? (for 
height)

Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:23:04 -0700
From: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:48075] Re: Letter to the North Denver Tribune
To: [email protected]



Why were width signs excluded?  Will it require a truck that is too wide to 
have an accident passing under a bridge or tunnel?  

Have you seen and dual signs yet?  Are they metres and feet on the same sign or 
is a metric only sign added to the post along with the imperial sign?

From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, July 7, 2010 3:59:03 PM
Subject: [USMA:48073] Re: Letter to the North Denver Tribune





 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 







It is now law in the
 United Kingdom 
that all new height (but not width) warning and restriction signs be in both
metric and imperial units. 

   









From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John M. 
Steele

Sent: 07 July 2010 19:21

To: U.S. Metric Association

Subject: [USMA:48070] Re: Letter
to the North Denver Tribune 



   





Hmm, two "barkatfish" e-mail addresses, arguing with each
other.  What could be suspicious about that? 





  





This is a horrible accident, but what are the odds that dual or metric
marking would have prevented it?  The article omits a lot of infomation: 





*First, is the bridge only marked in Imperial?  I understand that
is common in the UK ,
but the article doesn't say. 





*What is the nationality of the driver?  What is his relative
familiarity with Imperial and metric?  Is he licensed in the
 UK . 





*Finally, note there was a three foot (0.9 m) interference.  That
(in my view) is not confusion, but utter negligence or incompetence on the part
of the bus driver. 





  





Dual marking is a good idea.  It is used in some places (border
areas) in the US 
and seems to help.  Still the driver should ALWAYS be able to assess the
clearance is 3' less than his vehicle height in the complete absence of
markings. 





   









From:
"Anthony O&#39;conner" <[email protected]>

To: U.S. Metric Association
<[email protected]>

Sent: Wed, July 7, 2010 1:53:42 PM

Subject: [USMA:48069] Re: Letter
to the North Denver Tribune 











Stephen Humphreys claims: 





  





"I'm just intrigued in to how many people have died
from a bridge strike that showed just imperial measures. 







If you think about it it's probably difficult to die in such circumstances. The
driver is down in the cab and a pedestrian would have to be between the top of
the vehicle and the bottom of the bridge at exactly the time of the
strike." 





  





The double-decker bus is an iconic
 UK image. They
often hit low railway bridges. Unfortunately, passengers are sometimes killed 





  





http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/three-die-as-bus-hits-bridge-1449655.html 





  





Three die as bus hits bridge  





  





GRAHAM MOORBY  



Monday, 19 September 1994 



  



TWO WOMEN and a girl guide were killed after the roof was
ripped off their double-decker bus when it crashed into a railway bridge in
 Scotland last
night. 



Ten children with head injuries were among 20 people hurt in
the accident, which happened as a party of girl guides returned to
 Glasgow following a day trip to a holiday camp in
 Ayr . 

   

Inquiries centred on why the 13ft 6in double-decker had been
driven beneath the bridge where the clearance is 10ft 6in. The bridge has been
the scene of several accidents. 

   

In a later follow-up article in the Glasgow Herald, the
death-toll rose to 5 after 2 more children succumbed to their injuries 

   

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/bus-crash-toll-rises-to-five-as-girl-dies-1.483202
 



 

Many UK 
road safety organizations want to see dual marking of bridge heights made
compulsory. Stephen supports the view that it is too expensive & confusing
to mark metric heights on bridges. What price does he place on 3 young children
and 2 adult volunteers lives? 









[USMA:47827] RE: The Chunnel 

Stephen Humphreys

Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:03:53 -0700
 



I'm just intrigued in to how many people have died from a bridge strike that 

showed just imperial measures.

If you think about it it's probably difficult to die in such circumstances. The 

driver is down in the cab and a pedestrian would have to be between the top of 

the vehicle and the bottom of the bridge at exactly the time of the strike.

I can dream up a TV/film style disaster - say a truck hits a bridge and a train 

goes along the top of it seconds after the strike causing the train to come off 

the tracks and tear down the embankment - although that's fairly dramatic - I 

just can't see simple fatalities in such circumstances. Just damage and 

insurance claims. 





   









From: Stephen Humphreys
< [email protected] >

To: [email protected];
[email protected]

Sent: Wed, July 7, 2010 1:48:34 PM

Subject: RE: [USMA:48065] Re:
Letter to the North Denver Tribune



I guess that from the fonts (something someone else has picked up on) then you
are both sharing one account on the listserv.  Say hello to the rage twins
'Lee Roberts, (Argyll and Bute TSO), and John P Schweisthall (60-plus y/o who
lives with his mom)".  



   





That's probably it from
me to these odd balls as - as you can see yourself - it's just about
manipulation of text to focus the attention on a message that wasn't intended
(I think it's called 'distract and divert').  More from the archives soon,
I would bet. 







Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010
10:00:52 -0700

From: [email protected]

Subject: [USMA:48065] Re: Letter to the North Denver 
Tribune

To: [email protected] 





I see that Steve is spouting yet more garbage.

 

"I've seen official 'pint' glasses with 'made in
 france ' etched
into the base! ;-)"

 

He knows that the tolerances applied to any UK 
spirit, wine or beer capacity measure are set out in metric and checked by the
Approved Verifier in metric, yet he still persists in his fantasy that foreign
glass manufacturers use imperial measurement to manufacture
 UK pint
glasses. Just because a measure says "pint" does not mean that it has
been checked against an imperial standard.

 

He also "forgets" to mention that "pint" glasses (and other
metric measures used in UK 
bars) are now CE marked instead of the old "crown" stamp. CE marked
measures are accepted throughout Europe 
(wherever the sizes are legal for trade)

 

Has Stephen become a convert to EU standardization?

 

Finally, he fails to mention is that (apart from a few small niche
manufacturers), all large scale UK "pint" glass production has now
shifted to the Czech Republic & to France, as the 2 main UK manufacturers
went into liquidation (bankruptcy) a few years ago.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-425868/EU-stealing-crown-great-British-pint.html

 

"The manufacture of most pint and half-pint glasses has been shifted to
the Czech
 Republic , where costs are much
lower."

 

I'd be far more surprised if Steve could find a new pint glass marked
"made in the UK", but his "British is best" blinkers would
never allow him to admit that any British business has failed. 



 

[USMA:47864] Re: Letter to the North Denver 
Tribune

Stephen Humphreys

Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:48:19 -0700



In my opinion:

An outsourcing company treats the possible 'outsourcee' as a potential 

customer.  If the customer want imperial (or customary, or whatever) then
at 

the fear of losing a contract the external company will work to achieve such 

demands.

To use a similar example (not exactly the same but..) - I've seen official 

'pint' glasses with 'made in france '
etched into the base! ;-)



Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:02:49 -0700

From: [email protected]

Subject: [USMA:47863] Re: Letter to the North Denver 
Tribune

To: [email protected] 





   



   







Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up
now. 







   











                                          
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Reply via email to