I've often wondered why McDonalds doesn't rename its 'Quarter Pounder' to
something on the lines of 'Big One Hundred' or something similar (" ...a full
100 grams of fresh beef...."). Most customers would not notice the approx. 12%
reduction in meat content, and McDonalds would save that amount in meat costs
while likely getting away with charging the same price.
Blame not only the FPLA for non-rational sizing of products in Canada, but also
NAFTA, where the US managed to outlaw Canada's original laws regarding product
sizing.
In regards to BC, it is probably the least 'progressive' in terms of achieving
full metric conversion. Surprisingly, I've found Alberta - cowboy country - to
be more metric than anywhere else, while in Ontario and Nova Scotia - two
provinces I have spent much time in this year - you will have to look very hard
indeed to see any official signs on the roads with miles on them (and ft-in on
bridge signs - though more of these in NS than Ont), while in the stores,
anything pre-packaged (including say cold meats) is invariably (and as required
by law) to be labelled in metric units. Admittedly (and as I've mentioned
before and as Harry Wyeth pointed out) some of those sizes are oddball indeed,
and I couldn't relate them to ANY rational size, metric, imperial or USC
(shampoo in 1.08 L ?).
John F-L
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: U.S. Metric Association
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 4:31 AM
Subject: [USMA:48406] Re: Trip to Canada
Unless they're educated to display price per 100 grams! ;-)
-- Ezra
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carleton MacDonald" <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 7:34:57 PM
Subject: [USMA:48405] Re: Trip to Canada
One big reason they want to show prices in pounds is because the price per
unit is lower. Marketeering, after all.
cm
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 17:14
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:48404] Re: Trip to Canada
This is precisely where I think amending the FPLA to permit metric-only
labeling will have a disproportionately larger impact in Canada than it will in
the country (USA) that actually amends the law.
Once the "bandwagon" effect takes hold among US manufacturers to switch to
rational metric sizes with metric-only units, Canadians will likely see a
wholesale change-over to metric only units and rational sizes in packaged
goods. That has got to provide (in my view at least) a strong positive impulse
towards greater acceptance and use of metric units on their side of the border.
Wishful thinking or prescience? We'll find out soon enough (if the <bleep>ing
FPLA ever gets amended and signed into law)!
-- Ezra
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Wyeth" <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 1:23:16 AM
Subject: [USMA:48402] Trip to Canada
Many readers already know this, but here is what I found after a week in the
Vancouver area:
road signs in km, but at least a few still in miles, same with bridge height
signs; lots of signs with "Km" or "Kg"
some "kms" private signs
all exercise machines at a gym, and weights, still in lbs. and miles
grocery stores a total mess: fruits and veges in pounds, with kg sometimes
added; milk in nice 2 and 4 L containers; stuff in cans and bottles mostly in
US style
containers with oddball metric contents which are undoubtedly US
sizes; cans of beer in 355 and even 34-something mL sizes
a weird poster on a taxicab window advised riders that the cab rate was a
certain rate (such as $1.50) per 1.5 km, and helpfully added that this amounted
to xxx cents per something like 52.031 metres or some crazy figure!
I think fish and meat servings at restaurants often were offered in 8 and 12
ounce options
Canada obviously has a long way to go, but this is not news.
HARRY WYETH
