Pierre,
I have a different "which inch" question.  Perhaps you know from your 
surveying.  It is really "which foot, mile, and acre?"

NIST asserts in SP 811 (Appendix B.6) that the fathom, rod, chain, furlong, 
mile 
and acre are all based on the Survey foot.  This was certainly true for 
geodetic 
data on the NAD27 datum.  As the rod, chain, and furlong are probably obsolete, 
this is probably true now for those units.

For NAD83, the intent was to release geodetic data in meters only, but the 
State 
outcry resulted in USGS releasing conversions to either Survey or International 
foot, provided the State pass a law clarifying what it intended to use.  Some 
States HAVE adopted the International foot (Michigan being one).

So, in those States, are the fathom, mile and acre based on the International 
foot that the State has specified, or does the State insist on International 
values, and the Feds insist on Survey values within those States?

It would seem to me that the fathom, mile and acre (and modern rod, chain, and 
furlong, if such exist) depend on whether a particular State has specified 
International or Survey foot as its standard for surveying. (Land stays in the 
State, so hopefully whichever the State has chosen)

Taken to absurd, does an acre foot of water change size slightly as a river 
flows through Survey and International foot States, or does the Federal 
government use preemption and insist on the Survey foot for Interstate commerce 
(and water management).  (What happens when a river borders both an 
International and Survey foot State?)  I recognize the difference is too small 
to measure, but I wonder if the ramifications of the absurd "what foot would 
you 
like" position of USGS has ever been fully thought through.



________________________________
From: Pierre Abbat <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, September 5, 2010 1:00:51 PM
Subject: [USMA:48472] Re: Which inch?


On Saturday 04 September 2010 20:49:33 Pat Naughtin wrote:
> Dear John,
>
> In the definitions you report below, which inch applies?
>
> Is it now the 1960 (metric) inch set at 25.4 millimetres exactly?
>
> Is it the survey (metric) inch set at 1/36 of 36/39.37 of the
> international prototype metre set in 1893?

The gallon is defined in terms of the 25.4 mm inch, even when using the survey 
foot to measure distance. However, the 6 ppm difference in volume between 
gallons defined by the two inches is dwarfed by other uncertainties. When a 
surveyor computes a volume, usually it's either dirt being moved or storm 
water flowing. Neither the packing ratio of the dirt nor the friction of 
water on ground is known with anywhere near that precision.

Pierre
-- 
When a barnacle settles down, its brain disintegrates.
Já não percebe nada, já não percebe nada.

Reply via email to