The EPA is not very metric (they invented grams per mile).  I just took it as 
the flawed abbreviation that it is.  It is perfectly reasonable to assume they 
can't use SI symbols correctly and try to guess what they meant to say.




________________________________
From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 2:22:15 PM
Subject: [USMA:48924] Re: Nissan Leaf


Dear John,
Thanks for the correction. I think that I must have become over-confused by the 
"metric conversion" into EPA jargon. 


I suppose that you noticed the kW-hrs, which are presumable some way to measure 
energy. I could read this as kilowatt minus hour revolution second ??


Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia


On 2010/11/24, at 22:01 , John M. Steele wrote:

The cost is not very high.  Whatever the cost of a division by 1.609344 km/mi 
is.
>
>You may have reversed multiplication and division or something.  34 kWh/100 
>miles is 122.4 MJ/100 mi or ~0.76 MJ/km, well under the supposed goal of <2 
>MJ/km.
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
>To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 11:19:52 PM
>Subject: [USMA:48916] Nissan Leaf
>
>Dear All, 
>
>
>See http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/22/nissan-leaf-snags-99-mpg-rating-on-official-epa-sticker 
>
>
>
>
>Earlier I mentioned the cost of the "metric conversion" approach to 
>metrication. 
>I wonder how much this lot of metric conversion cost already and how much it 
>will cost in the future. This car was most likely designed by Nissan in Japan, 
>built wholly using metric units, particularly the millimetre, and then tested 
>using joules, watts kilograms, and kilometres. One wonders whether one of the 
>design goals was to get below 2 megajoules per kilometre.
>
>
>Finally, all the metric units have been hidden though the metric conversion 
>processes to comply with the regulations of the Environmental Protection 
>Agency 
>in the USA. I ask again, "At what cost?"
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Pat Naughtin
>Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders 
>Guide, see http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
>Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 
>PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
>Geelong, Australia
>Phone: 61 3 5241 2008
>
>
>Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
>thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
>system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands 
>each 
>year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
>services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
>commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
>in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
>NIST, 
>and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. 
>See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.
>
>

Pat Naughtin
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see 
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, 
and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. 
See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.

Reply via email to