Dear All,

I know you will be interested in this waste of time, energy, and loads of money 
at Boeing: 
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2010/12/breaking-boeing-halts-787-deli.html
 and here are the first two comments that apply to the metric system. Do a 
'Find' for 'metric' to see all of the others.
Boeing asked for most of the problems it is battling with when it outsourced 
design and manufacturing to metric companies using mm not medieval inches. To 
expect a smooth production process with that incompatible inanity is as 
somebody put it so aptly, HUBRIS. The billion/s, or so dollars Boeing lost so 
far would have paid for the complete metrication of its production process and 
pay annual dividends for wasting less time working with a hodgepodge of 
incoherent measurement units, let alone cheaper metric parts in the future.

Boeing asked for most of the problems it is battling with when it outsourced 
design and manufacturing to metric companies using mm not medieval inches. To 
expect a smooth production process with that incompatible inanity is, as 
somebody put it so aptly, HUBRIS. The billion/s, or so dollars Boeing lost so 
far would have paid for the complete metrication of its production process and 
pay annual dividends forever with wasting less time on working with a 
hodgepodge of incoherent measurement units, let alone having access to cheaper 
metric parts in the future.

And this quote refers to Airbus.
No, I am not joking. Outsourcing work in inches to a metric world that has no 
concept nor feel for that anachronism is asking for trouble and Boeing sure got 
and pays dearly for it. The first Potemkin village (787) they rolled out very 
prematurely had a gap of 60 mm on one spot between sections manufactured in 
Italy and the US. Those problems kept persisting with the Japanese and other 
manufacturers as well. Airbus outsources its work for decades to a metric world 
and has rarely problems.

Some years ago (2005), I was speaking at a conference in Arizona when I met 
some Airbus English and German aeronautical engineers who were staying at the 
same motel as me. We got chatting and I learned four things:
1       Airbus had a factory in Arizona as part of an arrangement where their 
aircraft could have a high enough USA component to be considered for USA 
purchase contracts. Most parts came from England, Germany, and other parts of 
Europe and were simply assembled in Arizona.
2       The aeronautical engineers worked strictly in metric in the factory, 
mostly in millimetres and sometimes in micrometres, but they chose to speak to 
non-factory Arizona locals outside the factory in feet and inches.
3       The engineers were employed on a "Fly In- Fly Out" where they worked in 
Arizona for two weeks and then flew home to England and Germany for a week for 
training and days off. They said they did not employ local engineers because 
they generally didn't understand metric.
4       To employ the workers on the floor of the factory they favoured people 
with a Spanish speaking background as they required less training to use 
millimetres

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see 
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat 
at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' 
newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.

Reply via email to