Does USMA have (at least indirectly) a supportive or at least neutral and open-minded contact inside the FMI? If so, that might be the place to start.
-- Ezra ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 5:11:22 PM Subject: [USMA:50307] Re: The FPLA amendment will likely make a difference I just learned today, indirectly, that one of the principal opponents of metric-only labeling of consumer products has retired from the Food Marketing Institute (FMI). Does this mean that approval of an amendment of the FPLA to permit metric-only labeling can begin to move forward? EAM ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:38:33 +0000 (GMT) >From: "[email protected] " <[email protected]> >Subject: [USMA:50306] Re: The FPLA amendment will likely make a difference >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> > > What a great topic and responses and follow-ups, do > we have a mindful level headed reporter in our mist? > I think this should be an article in the news letter > and hopefully picked up on outside media. It would > be great if other articles about other > 'oppositionist' institutions be written, too. > Bruce E. Arkwright, Jr > Erie PA > Linux and Metric User and Enforcer > > I will only invest in nukes that are 150 gigameters > away. How much solar energy have you collected > today? > Id put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a > source of power! I hope we dont have to wait til oil > and coal run out before we tackle that. I wish I had > a few more years left. -- Thomas Edison♽☯♑
