The problem is that hardware shops do not want to stock two items where one
will do.  If the gardener in question is taking orders from a member of the
general public, what you say is fine, but if the owner of the business
decides to do all work entirely in metric units, then using metric-only
measuring devices is in order.  The real problem arises when government
initiates a metrication program and then refused to take the lead.  

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John M. Steele
Sent: 13 June 2011 11:38
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:50609] Re: Not the way to metricate

 

I am NOT advocating dual tapes for general purposes.  I am advocating it for
one specific purpose.  To help a garden design experienced in inches design
in metric without teaching him a bunch of conversion math.  I'm open to
alternate approaches, but exactly how would you do it.

 

He only knows plant spacings, sizes, etc in inches and has to produce a
metric drawing.

 

  _____  

From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 3:07:30 AM
Subject: [USMA:50604] Re: Not the way to metricate

I find a dual tape a pain up the ****.  Even though I inherited half a dozen
tapes from my father-in-law (he measured up windows for the double glazing
business), I still bought a single unit tape when I was last in Belgium to
replace my old one which gave up the ghost. 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Pat Naughtin
Sent: 13 June 2011 04:49
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:50599] Re: Not the way to metricate

 

On 2011/05/31, at 21:37 , John M. Steele wrote:

 

I know Pat will disagree, but a dual tape is a good way to identify a round
metric number around an inch dimension you have in mind.  It is not a bad
crutch for a a couple of jobs, but it should then be replaced with a
metric-only tape.  It can be used to get across the point of sensible
rounding very well.

 

Dear John,

 

You are wrong. I agree with you when you say:

 

a dual tape is a good way to identify a round metric number around an inch
dimension you have in mind.

 

It is a good approach if you want to retain the use of old pre-metric
measuring words for as long as you possibly can. Friends who spent some
$30.00 on a high quality dual sided measuring tape in the 1970s still have
them and they can't see why they should buy a millimetre only tape now.

 

However in agreeing, I also note that you have chosen to use metric
conversion as part of your approach to metrication. With this approach I
totally disagree if complete metrication is your aim and a FAST metrication
upgrade is one of your requirements . See
http://metricationmatters.com/docs/ApproachesToMetrication.pdf and
http://metricationmatters.com/docs/MetricationInADay.pdf 

 

Cheers,

 

Pat Naughtin LCAMS

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html

Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
Asia, Europe, and in the USA . Pat's clients include the Australian
Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada , the
UK , and the USA . See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.

 

Reply via email to