I doubt it.  If you said East or West, then maybe.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Carleton MacDonald
Sent: 04 February 2012 20:06
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:51450] RE: Leap second lives to leap another year

 

"GPS time does not incorporate leap seconds and lags TAI by 19 s.  It is
widely distributed as a precision time source."

 

Wonder if this is why GPS shows my house as about 19 seconds south of where
it really is.

 

Carleton  

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John M. Steele
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 08:05
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:51443] Leap second lives to leap another year

 


Three actually, and the next leap second is the end of June 2012
(2012-06-30T23:59:60Z).  I don't know if this really relates to metrication,
but the current issue of "Metric Today" has about a 1.5 page story on the
proposal to kill the leap second.  People may be interested that any further
decision has been deferred to at least 2015:

http://www.nature.com/news/leap-second-granted-extra-time-1.9865

 

Leap seconds are currently declared with more than five months notice and
can only happen (or not happen) at defined times.  Any time-critical
software can and should be defined to accomodate this.  GPS time does not
incorporate leap seconds and lags TAI by 19 s.  It is widely distributed as
a precision time source.  Critical timing applications might do better
keeping TAI or GPS time and computing UTC with a leap second table.  Events
more than 6 months ahead would have a 1 s uncertainty in TAI until the
potential leap second in the interval is declared up or down.  But really,
If you know in mid-January, how hard is it to recompute events for the end
of June?  

 

For less critical applications, the GPS navigational message includes the
current offset to UTC, and the binary code embedded below voice in the WWV
broadcasts carries a leap second flag if there is a leap second at the end
of the current month.

 

I see no need to completely disconnect time from the sun.

 

Reply via email to