well said, Bridget. 

Another reason to move to metric is to be able to use calculators. since 
calculators are 10 based, it makes it instant to figure out how many marks on 
the ruler 0.27 is. In metric countries a third grader will tell you that right 
away, but in US it takes some time for a specialized science high school 
freshman to figure out. when i saw it with my eyes, I become passionate about 
US adopting metric system for the benefits of education.


My daughter, a high school senior now, learned metric system in elementary 
school as well as in all the science classes. But it will be marked in her head 
as "for something else" (travel, science) unless she sees it every day and in 
the first place, not  in parenthesis.

I believe the government should require for the consumer products metric 
measurements to be listed *first* on the products and imperial to be in 
parenthesis (and maybe optional, up to the manufacturer) and I don't think it 
would require any taxpayer's money.
I think some states at least allow that - I was surprised to get a JOBY gorilla 
tripod and to find on the package metric dimensions listed as primary. I am in 
love with the product partially because of that ;-)

tv weather channels/reports should start providing temperature in celcius at 
least silently on the screen to get kids get used to it and  for the sake of 
foreign visitors and immigrants(think New York) . i have sent emails to some tv 
channels about that but never heard from them back. 

Then, the schools and (non-science) education will follow. To learn metric 
system in elementary school but not to see and feel it in everyday life only 
adds confusion for kids.


also, to make older people comfortable, imperial measurements should be 
additionally provided in public places, highways, roads for, say, 50 years. 

I was really upset to learn recently that California transportation system went 
metric and then  returned back to imperial 
(http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/metric1/DD-12-R1_Final.pdf). what a waste of 
money (on both ways)!  ;-(
After that I stopped active discussions on the metric system and use partisan 
methods: stick a "pro-metric" signature to my emails, distribute metric 
rullers/conversion charts to my friends,  ask how many pints in a gallon at 
work.... Most people are not even aware that there is a need in metrication of 
US.

thanks,
Natalie 

43,560 square feet in an acre
5280 feet in a mile
16 ounces in a pound
128 ounces in a gallon
23 confused kids in a class
What could be simpler?

Inbox 4563
________________________________
 From: Metric Rules Info <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: [USMA:52002] Sent to WSJ....
 

Dear Sir:
 
Justin Scheck correctly points out that efforts to convert the United States to 
the metric system have faced significant cultural resistance over the past four 
decades ("Cooking a Poundcake in a Metric Oven Is No Easy Task", Nov. 24).  
Although metric system devotees are often portrayed as amusing eccentrics, a 
far more serious issue involves the significant disadvantage imposed on 
American students by an educational system that fails to adopt the weights and 
measures used not only by 95 percent of the world’s population but also in the 
fastest growing occupations in the United States.   
 
Current research suggests that as much as 40 percent of instructional time in 
primary and secondary education is now spent on standardized test preparation 
and administration.  By using customary units in standardized testing, 
particularly in science related subjects, American Educators and by extension 
our children are faced with the unique liability of dual-measurement 
instruction.  
 
It is commonly acknowledged that students who choose to enter Science, 
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields must learn to use the 
metric system.  Those who have the intellectual skills required to achieve 
these advanced degrees will likely find the conversion to "metric thinking" to 
be a modest burden compared to acquiring the rest of the knowledge needed to 
succeed in their chosen profession.  However, few realize that the healthcare 
industry is also exclusively metric.  As the fastest growing employment sector 
in the United States and currently employing one in eight Americans, millions 
of workers such as doctors, nurses, physician assistants, pharmacists, physical 
therapists, nutritionists, and home health care workers, to name a few, are 
required to learn and effectively function in metric units.  Learning a new 
measurement language is not an easy task for all Americans. Preventable 
medication errors in the United States continue
 to have deadly consequences. Please refer to the Institute of Safe Medication 
Practices (http://www.ismp.org/pressroom/PR20110808.pdf) for additional 
information. 
 
Healthcare and STEM occupations are only two areas of employment where American 
students are not well served by the use of customary units in K-12 STEM 
instruction.  Most modern career paths in manufacturing such as precision and 
additive manufacturing and notably, all American automotive manufacturing have 
voluntarily converted to metric units. The United States Armed Forces, which is 
the largest organization in the world, requires its workforce to learn and 
function in metric units.  
 
While it is certainly amusing to read about Zach Rodriguez's reprogramming of 
his parent's oven to display metric units, there are far more important 
questions requiring national attention. Why does our K-12 educational system 
continue to use customary measurement units in STEM instruction when neither 
university level programs nor professional employment opportunities utilize 
them?  Could one call educating our children to think and function in customary 
units an institutionalized cognitive disadvantage solely impacting American 
children?  I have not found any occupational evidence to support the continued 
practice of utilizing customary units in STEM instruction. 
 
I wish this article would have dedicated less time to the philosophical, 
cultural aversion to the adoption of the modern metric system and instead 
focused on a more practical question:  How might America’s preference towards 
customary units impact your child’s future employment opportunities?   
 
Cordially, 
Bridget Nagarajan
Executive Director, M Power 
(www.teammetric.org)

Reply via email to