I agree with most of your points.  I even agree that problems like "how many 
nanometers in a kilometer" just teach children to hate the metric system.

However, I have to take issue on the decimeter for two reasons:
*To understand metric, you have to understand the system of prefixes.  Perhaps 
a 
third grader doesn't need to understand from yotta- to yocto-, but should 
understand from micro- to mega-.  We have some here who want nothing to do with 
the "God-forsaken" prefixes centi-, deci-, deka-, and hecto-, but I don't 
agree.  They are defined by the BIPM as part of the SI, and nothing in the SI 
Brochure says they can't be used.

*The decimeter is really quite useful as the liter is 1 dm³.  I don't advocate 
it for measurement, but when a volume must be calculated, I find it much easier 
to convert millimeters or centimeters to decimeters and multiply out, vs 
dividing by 10^6 or 10^3 after the fact. So, I use it "all the time" or, at 
least, frequently.




________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, April 8, 2013 2:14:08 PM
Subject: [USMA:52631] The U.S. Isn't as Anti-metric as You Think

The recent exchange on this list about radiological units raises a bigger point 
that is often missed in discussions on the metric vs. customary systems with 
the 
public.  When it comes to most measurements, people are not as wedded to the 
customary system as they think.

Outside of a few common measurements in ordinary life -- the inch, the mile, 
the 
pound perhaps -- customary units don't make that much difference to people.  If 
you say that the speed of light is 300,000 k/s or 186,000 mi/s, how many people 
comprehend either?  The measures are used primarily for comparison or for 
standards.

Ask people how many feet there are in a mile.  Most don't know.  Ask people how 
many ounces there are in a pound.  Most don't know.  Most don't know that there 
is a troy ounce used to measure gold and an avoirdupois ounce to measure 
everything else.  Ask people how many ounces there are in a quart.  Most don't 
know.  Most don't even know that the ounce of mass and the ounce of fluid are 
different.

The metric system is a rational system that is easily understood, once people 
get past the notion of trying to "convert."  The quiz show "Are You Smarter 
than 
a Fifth Grader?" recently had a third-grade question:  "How many decimetres are 
there in a metre?"  This is what puts people off using the metric system.  When 
was the last time that you used a decimetre?

Whenever metric measurements have been introduced as a standard, there has been 
no public outcry.  Have you heard of any public outcry to return to measuring 
pills in grains rather than milligrams?  Have you heard of any public outcry to 
return to measuring wine in fluid ounces rather than millilitres?  Do people 
even know how many fluid ounces there are in a bottle of wine?  Do they even 
care?

All this folderol about opposition to metric "conversion" is a red herring.  I 
decided in my daily conversations not to use feet or inches, but metres and 
centimetres/millimitres.  Not once has anyone asked me: how long is that?

One of the websites that I founded has used SI metric only for almost twenty 
years now.  The site has nothing to do with science or engineering, but social 
issues.  Most of the readers are from the United States.  Not once in twenty 
years has anyone even commented on the exclusive use of metric.  I think that 
our motto should be:  Just do it!

Martin Morrison
Metric Training & Eductional Columnist
USMA's "Metric Today"

Reply via email to