I have similar problem in the UK - I paid €2.50 for my last all-metric tape 
(illustrated at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FourMetricInstruments.JPG ).  
BTW, we do not use euros in the UK - I bought it in a supermarket in Belgium)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: 26 April 2013 23:04
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:52706] Re: Why the Inconsistency?

When my wife (Michele) and I visited Canada a couple summers ago, I tried to 
purchase a metric-only tape measure in a store, but they only had tape measures 
cluttered with dreaded inches. We only visited a few places in British 
Columbia, which may not be representative of everywhere in Canada.

David Pearl MetricPioneer.com 503-428-4917

----- Message from [email protected] ---------
     Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
     From: [email protected]
Reply-To: Martin Morrison <[email protected]>
  Subject: [USMA:52705] Why the Inconsistency?
       To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>


> The Science Channel, which is a part of the Discovery complex, ran a 
> "How It's Made Program" last night.  From the credits at the end, at 
> least this episode was produced in Canada.  I was curious to see how 
> it would run in the United States.
>
> The program, in the segment on the mining of silver ore, always used 
> kilograms instead of pounds.  There was a close-up of a scale, which 
> displayed a reading in "mg".  But a distance was given in inches.
>
> These persistent inconsistences (as Canada certainly uses millimetres 
> or centimetres) are quite perplexing.  I could understand an 
> all-metric program or an all non-metric program, dumbed down for the 
> United States. Another program, on astronomy, talked about 
> astronomical distances in miles (where it hardly mattered for the 
> common perception), but shorter distances (such as for the size of a 
> meteor) in metres.
>
> It has always perplexed me why these programs are so inconsisent.   
> In a curious way, it confirms my approach that the United States is
> *not* a non-metric country.  It is a country stuck in the middle of 
> conversion, not unlike England and even Canada.
>
> Martin Morrison
> Training and SI Columnist, "Metric Today"
>
>


----- End message from [email protected] -----



Reply via email to