SI first would be a good step forward.  I agree with point 2.

John Altounji
One size does not fit all.
Social promotion ruined Education.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of mechtly, eugene a
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 9:54 AM
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; U.S. Metric Accociation
Subject: [USMA:54022] Legal Metrology Connection, Volume 5 Issue 5

I completed a reading of *Legal Metrology Connection* 5-5, (aka W&M
Connection).and ask the following questions:

1. In view of the *fact*, that three federal laws declare that units of
measurement from the International System of Units (SI) are preferred for
trade and commerce in the Unites State,

NIST has ample authority to *require* that declarations of net amounts
inside packages and containers be expressed In *first  place* in Units from
the SI, and only in second place in units from outside the SI, as required
by the current FPLA, even though the NCWM has not yet arrived at this
forward-looking requirement.

2. Why does NIST not promote, if not require, declarations of amount simply
by a number and the SI Unit, with "NET" or "NET CONTENTS" or "NET AMOUNT" as
*optional* modifiers?
   
Eugene Mechtly

________________________________________
From: Linda Crown [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 12:11 AM
To: mechtly, eugene a
Subject: Weights and Measures Connection, Volume 5 Issue 5

Dear Readers,

In this edition of the "Weights and Measures Connection," we introduce a new
member of the Office of Weights and Measures team, Mr. Clark Cooney.  Some
of you may already know Clark; however, we have provided a brief
introduction for those who do not.  There is also guidance on the use of
"Principal Display Panels on Random Packages" and an update on an
educational outreach effort conducted at a nearby middle school.

Please remember to check out the updated "Calendar" to see what OWM is
offering in the training area as well as scheduled meetings.

Online access is available to the newsletter at
http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/pubs/upload/WMConnections.pdf, and for your
convenience an Acrobat (.pdf) copy is attached.

As always, we would be happy to get your feedback and ideas for future
articles.

Happy reading,

Linda
Editor, "Weights and Measures Connection"
[email protected]
(301) 975-3998

Reply via email to