Linda, Thank you for your reply to my two recent questions.
Although NIST does not have the authority to directly regulate the labeling and sale of consumer commodities, NIST is the *trainer* of State. Regional, and Local Officials who do have the authority to remove products from sale if they do not meet requirements of the FPLA, e.g. requirements for both declarations. by SI Units , and by units from outside the SI. Since SI is *preferred* by Federal Laws, 94-168 of1975,100-418 of 1988, and 110-69 of 2007, there is sufficient "justification" to assure that SI is granted "first place" in the packaging and labeling instruction courses that NIST offers to State and Local Regulators. Is this "first place" status of SI being implemented by all NIST Instructors? SI Units, and units from outside the SI *are not of equal status* under the federal laws cited above! Note that the NCWN can not even decide what to call units from outside the SI; "U.S. customary" or "inch-pound" units? Eugene Mechtly ________________________________________ From: Crown, Linda D. [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:48 PM To: mechtly, eugene a Cc: Butcher, Kenneth S.; Hockert, Carol; Warfield, Lisa; [email protected] Subject: RE: Legal Metrology Connection, Volume 5 Issue 5 Dear Mr. Mechtly, Thank you for your query and the answers to your questions follow. In response to your question in 1: Be advised that NIST does not have any regulatory authority. Regulatory responsibility for packaging and labeling is the responsibility of the States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other federal agencies. When the SI revisions to the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) were incorporated into regulations in the early 1990s, the suggestion of requiring that SI units be displayed first (i.e., primary position) in a quantity declaration was considered. The proposal was not adopted for several reasons including (1) the FPLA itself did not specify which units had to be in the primary position in the quantity declaration, and (2) at the time many packagers provided both customary and SI units on packages with the SI in the secondary position and there was no justifiable reason to render those packages unacceptable under FPLA. In response to your question in 2: The Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulations adopted by the National Conference on Weights and Measures in 1993 and which is enforced by State and Local Weights and Measures Officials was developed to specifically promote the use of the SI. The method of displaying the quantity of contents you mentioned is already permitted under Section 6.3.1 "Use of Net Mass or Net Weight" which is shown below. 6.3.1. Use of "Net Mass" or "Net Weight." - A quantity declaration may stand alone [e.g., "200 g (7 oz)" or "1 lb (453 g)"] or may include the term "net mass" or "net weight" either preceding or following the declaration. The term "net" by itself may be used on food labels. However, the quantity of contents shall always declare the net quantity of contents even when such terms are not used. (Amended 1993) Have a wonderful day. Linda Linda Crown Weights and Measures Coordinator Publications National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 2600 Bldg. 222, Room B250 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (301) 975-3998 Fax: (301) 975-8091 URL: http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/ -----Original Message----- From: mechtly, eugene a [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 12:54 PM To: Crown, Linda D.; Butcher, Kenneth S. Cc: Warfield, Lisa; Hockert, Carol; U.S. Metric Accociation Subject: Legal Metrology Connection, Volume 5 Issue 5 I completed a reading of *Legal Metrology Connection* 5-5, (aka W&M Connection).and ask the following questions: 1. In view of the *fact*, that three federal laws declare that units of measurement from the International System of Units (SI) are preferred for trade and commerce in the Unites State, NIST has ample authority to *require* that declarations of net amounts inside packages and containers be expressed In *first place* in Units from the SI, and only in second place in units from outside the SI, as required by the current FPLA, even though the NCWM has not yet arrived at this forward-looking requirement. 2. Why does NIST not promote, if not require, declarations of amount simply by a number and the SI Unit, with "NET" or "NET CONTENTS" or "NET AMOUNT" as *optional* modifiers? Eugene Mechtly ________________________________________ From: Linda Crown [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 12:11 AM To: mechtly, eugene a Subject: Weights and Measures Connection, Volume 5 Issue 5 Dear Readers, In this edition of the "Weights and Measures Connection," we introduce a new member of the Office of Weights and Measures team, Mr. Clark Cooney. Some of you may already know Clark; however, we have provided a brief introduction for those who do not. There is also guidance on the use of "Principal Display Panels on Random Packages" and an update on an educational outreach effort conducted at a nearby middle school. Please remember to check out the updated "Calendar" to see what OWM is offering in the training area as well as scheduled meetings. Online access is available to the newsletter at http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/pubs/upload/WMConnections.pdf, and for your convenience an Acrobat (.pdf) copy is attached. As always, we would be happy to get your feedback and ideas for future articles. Happy reading, Linda Editor, "Weights and Measures Connection" [email protected] (301) 975-3998
